FR 2021-01423

Overview

Title

Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Norfolk Southern wants to change or stop using certain train signals on a specific track because they think they don't need them anymore, and people can tell the train people what they think by sending messages until March 11.

Summary AI

Norfolk Southern Corporation has requested approval from the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to discontinue or modify a signal system on the S line from Craggy to Morristown. The company wants to stop using a traffic control system in this area because it's no longer needed for operations and plans to change several automatic signals. The FRA is accepting comments on this proposal until March 11, 2021, and people can submit their thoughts through various methods like online, fax, mail, or in-person delivery. If anyone wants a public hearing, they must request it before the comment deadline.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 6950
Document #: 2021-01423
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 6950-6951

AnalysisAI

The document titled "Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System" is a public notice issued by the United States Department of Transportation's Federal Railroad Administration. It announces a petition from Norfolk Southern Corporation seeking approval to discontinue or modify a signal system on a certain rail line. The request is specifically to stop using the traffic control system between Craggy and Morristown, as it is deemed no longer necessary for current operations.

General Summary

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NS) has requested to change how signals are managed on a section of their railway line, referred to as the S line. The company intends to transition from using a traffic control system (TCS) to a different operation style that is supposedly better aligned with current needs. This involves making certain signals non-controlled and altering others. Importantly, they explain that operational requirements have shifted, and thus, the existing system is redundant.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the noticeable issues with the document is the absence of detailed reasons justifying the discontinuance of the Traffic Control System. Without a clear explanation, it might seem opaque, leaving room for stakeholders to question the reasoning behind this significant change. There is also a lack of information regarding any potential safety implications or other impacts that might arise from this discontinuation. These omissions could be a point of concern for communities and individuals relying on the rail system for transportation or business.

Moreover, the document outlines the public participation process, noting that written comments are invited, yet a public hearing is not anticipated. While the submission methods are diverse, the decision against holding hearings might limit direct public engagement and bypass an avenue for community input.

The document also uses technical terms like "NS Rule 171 operation" without any explanation, which could confuse laypersons who may want to understand what these changes mean practically and ensure that safety and service quality are preserved.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the discontinuance of the signal system could affect several stakeholders, including rail passengers, local communities, and businesses that rely on efficient and safe rail services. If the changes curtail safety or service quality, this could inadvertently inconvenience or financially impact these groups.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Railroad Operators and Employees: For Norfolk Southern, the changes might streamline operations and reduce costs associated with maintaining a traffic control system that is purportedly unnecessary. For employees, particularly those whose roles involve system maintenance or management, there might be implications in terms of job duties or even job security.

Local Communities: For communities along the S line, particularly in areas where railroad tracks intersect public roads, changes to signal management could influence local traffic patterns and safety. However, without a clear understanding of the impacts, community stakeholders might find it difficult to prepare adequately.

Regulatory and Oversight Bodies: For the Federal Railroad Administration, monitoring and ensuring the safety and efficiency of railroad operations remain crucial. The agency's decision-making process might be called into question if stakeholders perceive a deficiency in transparency or public engagement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Norfolk Southern Corporation’s proposal to discontinue a traffic control system appears to be a straightforward operational adjustment, the document highlights a need for more detailed information and clearer communication. Addressing the transparency issues, safety implications, and encouraging comprehensive public participation might help alleviate concerns and ensure that the move is beneficial for all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed reasons for why the Traffic Control System (TCS) discontinuance no longer requires its operation, which could be seen as a lack of transparency.

  • • There is no information on potential impacts or safety concerns related to the discontinuance of the signal system, which might be important for stakeholders.

  • • The process for public participation is described, but the document mentions that FRA does not anticipate a public hearing. This could limit public engagement and oversight.

  • • The language relating to the process of submitting comments or requesting a public hearing might be unclear to individuals not familiar with regulatory procedures, potentially hindering effective public participation.

  • • No cost estimates or financial analysis are provided for the discontinuance or modification of the signal system, making it challenging to assess if there is any wasteful spending or cost-effectiveness concerns.

  • • The term 'NS Rule 171 operation' is used but not explained in the document, which could lead to ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with railroad operations standards.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 699
Sentences: 24
Entities: 71

Language

Nouns: 246
Verbs: 55
Adjectives: 21
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.84
Average Sentence Length:
29.12
Token Entropy:
5.22
Readability (ARI):
19.33

Reading Time

about 2 minutes