FR 2021-01412

Overview

Title

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Science Board is having a phone meeting where people can listen to them talk about their plans, but they need to sign up first by sending an email. They will talk about what they want to do in their next meeting, but they did not say exactly what topics they will talk about this time.

Summary AI

The National Science Board's Executive Committee is holding an open teleconference meeting, as announced in accordance with regulations from the National Science Foundation and the Government in the Sunshine Act. The meeting is scheduled for Monday, January 25, 2021, from 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. EST, and will be hosted by the National Science Foundation in Alexandria, Virginia. The agenda includes opening remarks from the Committee Chair, approval of previous meeting minutes, and discussions for the next National Science Board meeting in February. Public participation requires prior registration by emailing the National Science Board and will be provided with a toll-free dial-in number upon request.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 6372
Document #: 2021-01412
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 6372-6373

AnalysisAI

The document at hand is a notice from the National Science Board's Executive Committee concerning an upcoming teleconference scheduled for January 25, 2021. To give context, the announcement is made in accordance with various legal frameworks such as the National Science Foundation regulations and the Government in the Sunshine Act. These laws require public notification of meetings to ensure transparency in government proceedings.

General Summary

This notice formally announces an open meeting of the Executive Committee of the National Science Board. It will be held via teleconference, enabling discussions about board business. Significant points on the agenda include opening remarks from the Committee Chair, approval of previous meeting minutes, and discussions about issues for an upcoming Board meeting in February. The meeting is accessible to the public, but interested attendees must register via email at least 24 hours in advance to receive a toll-free number for accessing the teleconference.

Significant Issues or Concerns

A number of concerns emerge from the notice that could impact its effectiveness and the public's ability to engage:

  1. Lack of Detailed Agenda: The notice fails to specify the exact issues or topics to be discussed in the meeting. This lack of detail can hinder interested parties from adequately preparing or deciding whether the meeting's content justifies their participation.

  2. Public Participation: Although the meeting is open to the public, the notice only provides limited instructions for public engagement, specifically mentioning only listening to the meeting. It doesn't clarify if or how the public can participate actively or provide input.

  3. Registration Requirement: The requirement for emailing in advance to access the teleconference might pose a barrier. This requirement could be particularly restrictive for anyone who learns about the meeting close to its scheduled time.

  4. Web Address Issues: The document mentions URLs containing special characters that might confuse individuals attempting to access related online information.

  5. Supporting Materials: The notice does not mention any supplementary materials that may be needed or beneficial for attendees, which could enhance understanding of the topics discussed during the teleconference.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the broader public, this notice reflects governmental transparency and openness by offering an opportunity to listen to the National Science Board's discussions. It illustrates the government's commitment to keeping its citizens informed about national scientific governance.

For specific stakeholders, such as educators, scientists, or organizations with vested interests in science policy, the lack of detailed agenda topics could be frustrating. Without specific details, these stakeholders may not effectively engage or prioritize participation in the teleconference. Furthermore, the cumbersome registration requirement could deter individuals who might have made meaningful contributions.

In summary, while the document demonstrates compliance with transparency requirements, it could improve in terms of accessibility and inclusivity for potential participants. Clarifying the agenda, easing registration processes, and explicitly stating opportunities for public interaction would enhance this notice's transparency and usefulness.

Issues

  • • The notice lacks specific information about the agenda items to be discussed, which could make it difficult for interested parties to prepare or decide whether to attend.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of how the public can participate actively in the teleconference, beyond just listening.

  • • The contact information requires participants to email at least 24 hours in advance to gain access, which may be a barrier to public participation if the person learns about the meeting just before it occurs.

  • • The document refers to URLs with special characters ('​') which might make it difficult to locate the exact web pages.

  • • The document could be more transparent by including any supporting documentation or materials that will be referenced during the meeting.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 321
Sentences: 12
Entities: 40

Language

Nouns: 116
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.86
Average Sentence Length:
26.75
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
18.02

Reading Time

about a minute or two