FR 2021-01303

Overview

Title

Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustments

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. Department of the Interior has made a new rule to update the money fines people have to pay if they break certain laws about Native American burial sites, making sure these fines stay fair even when money value changes over time. They do this every year to keep the fines strong and meaningful, without having people give comments or suggestions beforehand.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of the Interior has announced a final rule to adjust civil penalties for inflation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. These adjustments are required annually by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 and are intended to maintain the effectiveness of penalties. The rule updates specific penalty amounts and applies to violations of Federal civil statutes. No public comment period or prior notice was required for this adjustment.

Abstract

This rule revises U.S. Department of the Interior regulations implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to provide for annual adjustments of civil penalties to account for inflation under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 and Office of Management and Budget guidance. The purpose of these adjustments is to maintain the deterrent effect of civil penalties and to further the policy goals of the underlying statute.

Type: Rule
Citation: 86 FR 7653
Document #: 2021-01303
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7653-7655

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces a final rule issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The rule addresses the need to adjust civil penalties related to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. This adjustment is part of an annual obligation set by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, designed to ensure that penalties remain effective as deterrents by accounting for inflation.

Summary of the Document

The rule aims to update civil penalties by applying a specific inflation multiplier, which for the year at hand is 1.01182. This multiplier is derived from changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). These fiscal updates are crucial as they maintain the consistency of penalty values over time, ensuring continued compliance with Federal statutes.

The effective date of this rule was February 1, 2021, and the changes are binding on penalties assessed after this date. Notably, this rule does not alter penalties that have already been assessed in the past, aligning with existing statutory authorities.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One issue pertains to the lack of detailed historical context on previous penalty amounts, which makes it challenging for readers to understand the full scope of these adjustments. The document does not specify the exact penalties from 2020, only presenting the numbers after applying the multiplier for 2021, which might lead to some ambiguity.

Furthermore, the explanation of how the inflation multiplier is calculated might not be sufficiently clear for individuals unfamiliar with the CPI-U adjustments. This complexity could hinder a transparent understanding of the adjustments by those not versed in economic calculations.

Another concern arises from the procedural aspects as the document indicates a deviation from standard rulemaking processes under the Administrative Procedure Act, as required by OMB guidance. This bypass of public comment periods might limit public engagement and transparency.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this rule aims to ensure that penalties retain their deterrent power, which benefits the overall public by encouraging adherence to laws pertaining to Native American grave protections and repatriation. By ensuring that penalties reflect current economic conditions, the rule safeguards the legislative intent of the underlying acts.

However, for individuals or entities subject to these penalties, especially those unfamiliar with the changes, this rule could lead to financial uncertainty. The lack of prior notification or public comment reduces the opportunity for affected parties to prepare for these financial impacts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Native American tribes, the enforcement of these updated penalties supports the preservation of cultural heritage, as it discourages violations of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. It reinforces government efforts to support tribal sovereignty and protect sacred sites.

Conversely, organizations like museums or archeological entities might experience an increased financial burden if they find themselves subject to penalties for non-compliance. The adjustments ensure that they stay informed and updated on the regulatory landscape to avoid violations.

In summary, while this final rule plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of statutory penalties amid inflation, it does present issues related to transparency and the clarity of implementations. These obstacles can affect various stakeholders differently, highlighting the importance of clear communication and legislative processes that account for public input.

Financial Assessment

The final rule described in the Federal Register document focuses on adjusting civil monetary penalties to account for inflation, as mandated by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The primary financial action in this rule is the adjustment of penalties that are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of the Interior as part of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).

Financial Adjustments and Their Context

The rule outlines that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued guidance directing federal agencies to adjust penalties using a cost-of-living adjustment multiplier of 1.01182 for 2021. This multiplier is based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as of October 2020. The agencies are instructed to round the adjusted figures to the nearest dollar. This specific methodology ensures uniformity and transparency in applying adjustments across different federal penalties.

These adjustments are essential to maintain the deterrent effect of civil penalties in light of inflation, aligning with the legislation's aim to prevent the erosion of penalty values over time. Notably, these adjustments affect only civil penalties, not fees associated with services, permits, or criminal penalties.

Ambiguity and Transparency Considerations

However, an identified issue is that the document does not specify the exact penalty amounts from 2020 that served as the basis for applying the multiplier. For instance, while it explains the multiplier usage, the lack of clarity about previous penalty figures may lead to ambiguity, making it challenging for stakeholders to trace the evolution of penalty values over time. For example, penalties under NAGPRA were adjusted from $6,955 to $7,037 and $1,392 to $1,408 as outlined in paragraph (g)(2) the document.

Additionally, the document states that this adjustment occurs without a public comment period due to the OMB’s interpretation under the Administrative Procedure Act. This approach can limit opportunities for public input and transparency, which may be another point of concern for stakeholders who prefer more open discussions regarding financial regulations.

Broader Economic Impact

The rule asserts that these adjustments do not have a significant economic impact, which means they do not result in an annual economic effect of $100 million or more. This indicates that while the financial changes are necessary for compliance and effectiveness, they are unlikely to burden the economy significantly or to require an extensive review under various regulatory statutes, such as the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

In summary, the rule adjusts civil penalties in light of inflation but could benefit from greater clarity regarding how these adjustments are calculated and more opportunities for public engagement in the process. The described financial adjustments play a crucial role in ensuring penalties under federal regulations continue to fulfill their deterrent purpose without imposing undue economic strain.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the exact penalties from 2020 that were subject to the multiplier, which could lead to ambiguity about historical penalty amounts.

  • • The reasoning behind specific penalty calculations or the choice of the multiplier (1.01182) is not fully explained, which might be unclear for those unfamiliar with CPI-U adjustments.

  • • The section discussing the action of the document refers to the document classification as both 'final rule' and mentions adjustments implying ongoing processes, which may cause confusion.

  • • The statement that no proposed rule is required under the Administrative Procedure Act due to OMB guidance could be considered limiting in terms of public feedback and transparency.

  • • Some of the regulatory citations (e.g., 43 CFR 46.210(i) and 43 CFR 46.215) are mentioned without concise explanation, which may require additional research by the reader to fully understand their implications.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,069
Sentences: 72
Entities: 166

Language

Nouns: 663
Verbs: 161
Adjectives: 138
Adverbs: 24
Numbers: 102

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.75
Average Sentence Length:
28.74
Token Entropy:
5.56
Readability (ARI):
19.03

Reading Time

about 7 minutes