FR 2021-01294

The document is a notice from the Department of Education (ED), specifically from the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS). It invites public comments on the extension of an existing information collection form known as the OSERS Peer Reviewer Data Form. The purpose of the form is to assist OSERS in identifying qualified individuals to review grant applications, thereby aiding in the allocation of federal resources for education and rehabilitation services. The extension request does not involve any changes to the current format of the form, and individuals have until March 23, 2021, to submit their comments.

General Summary

The notice outlines the Department of Education's intent to continue using the OSERS Peer Reviewer Data Form to gather necessary information on potential peer reviewers for grant applications. This process is governed by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which aims to minimize the burden of federal information collection. The form collects personal and professional details from individuals or households, which OSERS uses for selecting appropriate reviewers.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several potential issues emerge from the document. Firstly, there is no mention of the total cost or any budget implications arising from the use of the form, leaving questions about financial efficiency unanswered. Furthermore, the criteria for selecting peer reviewers are insufficiently detailed, which might inadvertently benefit certain applicants or institutions over others.

The language used to guide the public on where and how to submit comments is rather complex, potentially confusing individuals who may wish to provide their input. Additionally, although the need for the form is acknowledged, the rationale behind extending its usage without modification could be better elaborated, as this lack of clarity might hinder public understanding of its necessity and utility.

Moreover, the document does not discuss how compliance with the Privacy Act is ensured, which could be crucial given that personal information is being collected.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the continuation of this information collection activity may have indirect consequences for public programs and services. By ensuring that qualified reviewers evaluate grant applications, the Department aims to enhance the quality of funded projects, potentially resulting in improved educational and rehabilitative services.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The document may elicit differing responses from various stakeholders. For potential reviewers, the unchanged extension of the form signifies a continued opportunity to participate in the evaluation process and contribute their expertise. For applicants seeking grants, a robust and fair review process ensures an equitable allocation of resources, potentially improving program outcomes.

Conversely, for individuals concerned with data privacy or the complexities of federal processes, the lack of detailed information on privacy safeguards and the complicated language for comment submission might raise concerns. Clarity and transparency are vital in encouraging public engagement, and the current document could better achieve these goals.

In summary, while the notice aims to maintain a crucial information collection activity, its effectiveness could be enhanced by addressing the concerns raised, ensuring stakeholders and the wider public are well informed and able to participate constructively.