FR 2021-01247

Overview

Title

Submission for Review: 3206-0128, Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions (CSRS)-SF 2802 and Current/Former Spouse's Notification for Refund of Retirement Deductions Under CSRS-SF 2802A

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to hear people's thoughts about some forms used when workers want their money back from retirement savings, and they also have to let their husband or wife know about it. They're checking if these forms are good or complicated to fill out.

Summary AI

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is inviting public comments on a revised information collection request related to the Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions (CSRS) and the notification to a current or former spouse of the applicant. These forms, known as SF 2802 and SF 2802A, are used for processing refunds of retirement deductions. The OPM is seeking feedback particularly on the necessity and efficiency of this information collection process. Comments can be submitted until February 22, 2021, and the feedback collected will help assess the practicality and clarity of the forms and their processes.

Abstract

Retirement Services, Office of Personnel Management (OPM) offers the general public and other federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a revised information collection request (ICR), SF 2802 [Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions: CSRS] and SF 2802A [Notification of Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions Under CSRS].

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 6381
Document #: 2021-01247
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 6381-6382

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register contains a notice from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), inviting public comments on a revised information collection request regarding the refund of retirement deductions under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). The document specifically concerns two forms: SF 2802, the Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions, and SF 2802A, the Notification to Current or Former Spouses about such applications. The OPM seeks public feedback on the necessity, practicality, and efficiency of this collection process, highlighting a deadline for comments set on February 22, 2021.

General Summary

The notice serves as an invitation for feedback from the public and federal agencies on the updated information collection process related to retirement deductions refund under the CSRS. The forms at the center of this request gather essential data to ensure that both applicants and their current or former spouses are properly informed and involved in the application process for retirement fund refunds. The OPM seeks comments to improve the quality, efficiency, and clarity of the process.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One of the more notable issues with the document lies in its complex language, which may pose a challenge to readers without a background in legal or bureaucratic affairs. This could limit public engagement and the quality of feedback received due to difficulties in understanding the document's full implications.

Moreover, the document does not provide a comprehensive overview of comments received in previous notices, creating a gap in transparency regarding public interaction with the process. Additionally, there is a lack of clarity on how the collected information will be utilized beyond general functions, potentially leaving respondents uncertain about the purpose and importance of their involvement.

Another significant concern is the lack of a detailed explanation on how the estimated burden hours for respondents were calculated. A clearer breakdown of this estimation could build trust in the process and ensure that respondents understand the time commitment involved.

Furthermore, while the notice mentions the use of technological collection techniques, it does not specify what these techniques entail, leaving potential gaps in respondents’ understanding of how their data will be submitted and processed.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document invites participation and feedback from the general public, which could lead to an improved process for handling retirement fund refunds. Ideally, public comments will help address any practical concerns and ensure the forms are accessible and straightforward for future applicants. However, due to its complex language, some individuals might find it difficult to engage meaningfully with the request.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For individuals directly affected by retirement deductions, the notice represents an opportunity to shape a process that could impact their financial planning. Improved clarity and efficiency in the form and information collection process could have positive effects, such as faster processing times and less confusion about responsibilities and outcomes. Conversely, if issues noted above are not addressed, stakeholders might continue to encounter difficulties in navigating the process, potentially leading to delays or errors in refund applications.

Overall, while the document strives to enhance and refine the refund process for retirement deductions, the issues surrounding clarity and transparency highlight significant areas that require attention to ensure effective public participation and stakeholder satisfaction.

Issues

  • • The language used in the document is somewhat complex, potentially making it difficult for individuals without a legal or bureaucratic background to fully understand the implications and requirements.

  • • The document mentions that comments were encouraged in a previous notice but does not specify how many, if any, comments were received this time. This lack of information could be considered a transparency issue.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of how the proposed collection of information will be utilized by the agency, apart from general statements about performance and function, which might not provide sufficient context for potential respondents.

  • • The burden hours estimation for respondents is given without a breakdown of how this was calculated. Providing more detail could enhance understanding and trust in the numbers.

  • • The notice does not provide any specific examples of the technological collection techniques that will be used, even though it mentions them, which could leave gaps in understanding regarding the data submission process.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 706
Sentences: 31
Entities: 64

Language

Nouns: 230
Verbs: 44
Adjectives: 24
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 49

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.43
Average Sentence Length:
22.77
Token Entropy:
5.00
Readability (ARI):
18.77

Reading Time

about 2 minutes