FR 2021-01197

Overview

Title

Information Collection Requirement; Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Prohibition of Foreign Commercial Satellite Services From Certain Foreign Entities-Representations

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Defense wants to make sure that the people they buy satellite services from are not from certain countries they're not supposed to do business with. They are asking for public opinions on how they plan to collect this information, and they expect only a small number of people to respond, which means it might not cover everybody it should.

Summary AI

The Defense Acquisition Regulations System under the Department of Defense plans to revise and extend a rule related to the use of commercial satellite services from certain foreign entities. They aim to gather information to determine if companies offering these services fall under specific prohibitions. The public is invited to submit comments by February 18, 2021. This initiative requires paperwork that businesses must complete to comply with the rule, affecting about 235 respondents with an expected total response time of 58 hours annually.

Abstract

The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has submitted to OMB for clearance the following proposed revision and extension of a collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 5150
Document #: 2021-01197
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 5150-5151

AnalysisAI

The document, issued by the Defense Acquisition Regulations System of the Department of Defense (DoD), is a notice regarding the planned revision and extension of a rule under the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). This rule relates to the acquisition of commercial satellite services from certain foreign entities. The regulation requires businesses that deal with commercial satellite services to provide specific information to ensure they are compliant with the rules prohibiting the acquisition of such services from certain foreign entities. Public comments are invited until February 18, 2021, to provide input on this information collection process.

The notice outlines that the regulation in question involves a paperwork requirement that businesses must fulfill to continue benefiting from related contracts. This affects approximately 235 respondents annually, with an estimated total burden time of 58 hours per year. This means on average, each business will spend about 15 minutes preparing their response.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the main issues with the document is the lack of clarity regarding which foreign entities are prohibited from offering commercial satellite services. Without specifying the entities or the criteria used to determine which ones are banned, stakeholders may be uncertain about compliance requirements. This absence of detailed guidance might lead to confusion and increased administrative workload as businesses try to ascertain their compatibility with the rule.

Additionally, the submission process for public comments is somewhat convoluted. The document provides multiple methods and points of contact for submitting comments, such as email and the Federal eRulemaking Portal. While offering multiple channels can be beneficial, it also risks complicating the process and might discourage participation if not clearly explained.

Another point of concern is the lack of explanation for the predicted number of respondents. With only 235 respondents identified, the approach to estimating this number is not clear from the document. This raises questions about the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the data collection effort, potentially omitting significant numbers of stakeholders affected by the regulation.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broadly, the document impacts all businesses that offer, or plan to offer, commercial satellite services potentially conflicting with the specified prohibitions. Ensuring compliance might necessitate additional administrative work for these companies, potentially diverting resources from other business activities.

For specific stakeholders, such as satellite service providers, the regulation can have mixed impacts. Positively, it might provide a level playing field by preventing entities from banned jurisdictions from participating in the market, thus fostering fair competition. On the negative side, the ambiguity and potentially heavier administrative burden could challenge smaller businesses that might lack the resources to ensure full compliance efficiently.

Overall, while the revision and extension of this rule aim to mitigate security risks associated with foreign satellite services, they also highlight the need for clear, accessible guidelines and an efficient feedback process. Ensuring stakeholders fully understand the requirements and can easily engage with the regulatory process would likely enhance compliance and the efficacy of this regulatory effort.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify which foreign entities are prohibited, which might lead to confusion about compliance requirements.

  • • The submission process for comments could be clearer; multiple points of contact and submission methods may cause complications.

  • • There is no mention of any specific criteria or guidelines for determining whether an offeror is subject to prohibition beyond being a 'foreign entity', which may need clarification.

  • • The notice does not explain why only 235 respondents are anticipated or how this figure was estimated, which could raise questions about the data collection's comprehensiveness.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 517
Sentences: 25
Entities: 32

Language

Nouns: 190
Verbs: 30
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.01
Average Sentence Length:
20.68
Token Entropy:
4.89
Readability (ARI):
20.46

Reading Time

about a minute or two