FR 2021-01033

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission got some papers from energy companies wanting to change how they make and send electricity. People can say what they think about these changes by early February.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received several filings regarding changes in energy generation and transmission. These include self-certifications by companies like Aquamarine Westside and amendments to tariffs by entities such as Southern California Edison Company and Southwest Power Pool. Comments on these filings are due by February 1 or 2, 2021, depending on the specific docket. Anyone interested in intervening or protesting these proceedings must follow the Commission's rules and submit by the comment deadline.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 5179
Document #: 2021-01033
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 5179-5180

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), published in the Federal Register, outlines a series of recent filings related to energy generation and transmission. These filings come from various companies and entities, including Aquamarine Westside, LLC, Southern California Edison Company, and the Southwest Power Pool, Inc., among others. The document provides key details such as docket numbers, applicants, filing descriptions, and deadlines for comments. The primary purpose of these filings is to notify the public and relevant stakeholders about changes and updates in the energy sector that require regulatory approval or intervention.

General Summary

The notice informs the public of several self-certification filings from companies seeking recognition as exempt wholesale generators. Additionally, there are tariff amendment filings from Southern California Edison and the Southwest Power Pool. These involve changes to transmission regulations and agreements that impact electricity pricing and distribution. The document specifies due dates for public comments, which are February 1 or 2, 2021, depending on the filing. This timeline offers interested parties a window to voice objections or support.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A significant issue with the document is its complexity, particularly in the context of the FERC's deregulatory filings. The text is heavily laden with technical terminology related to energy tariffs and generator statuses, which could be cumbersome for the uninitiated reader. The use of multiple docket and accession numbers without clear explanations may further confuse individuals unfamiliar with FERC’s eLibrary system or filing processes. Furthermore, the document lacks specific financial information, which could be relevant to assessing potential increases in consumer costs or identifying regulatory capture by specific entities.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the filings represent operational changes that could affect energy prices and services. Tariff amendments and generator statuses are critical components that might influence how energy is distributed and priced. However, given the complex nature of the document, the general audience may struggle to fully understand how these filings directly impact their monthly utility bills or local energy infrastructure. This opacity might limit public engagement and participation in the regulatory process.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The document holds particular significance for energy companies, utility providers, and regulators. For energy companies like Aquamarine Westside, acquiring status as an exempt wholesale generator can confer certain tax and regulatory benefits, potentially altering the competitive landscape. Tariff amendments by entities such as Southern California Edison could impact other energy providers’ operations by changing the landscape of energy distribution and pricing mechanisms.

Regulators and stakeholders with vested interests in the energy sector may also perceive these filings as an opportunity to influence policy decisions. However, the procedural complexity and lack of a straightforward guide on how to effectively intervene or protest could serve as barriers to stakeholders who are not deeply familiar with FERC's regulatory framework.

Conclusion

While the document provides essential information on regulatory changes within the energy sector, its complexity poses challenges to the general public’s understanding and engagement. Simplifying the language and offering a more accessible explanation of processes could enhance public participation and transparency. Meanwhile, stakeholders must navigate this complexity to protect their interests or support changes they view as beneficial to the energy landscape. The filings underscore the ongoing evolution in energy regulation and its implications for both the industry and consumers.

Issues

  • • The document contains no detailed financial information regarding spending or expenditures, making it difficult to assess for wastefulness or favoritism in spending.

  • • The document references multiple docket numbers and accession numbers without providing context or explanations for each, which may be confusing to readers not familiar with the eLibrary system or FERC's filing processes.

  • • The language used in describing tariff amendments and generator statuses might be considered complex for general readers unfamiliar with energy regulatory terminology.

  • • The document outlines procedures for intervention and protests without offering a simple summary or guide to the process, which could be helpful for stakeholders unfamiliar with regulatory filings.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,906
Sentences: 104
Entities: 264

Language

Nouns: 712
Verbs: 43
Adjectives: 23
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 233

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.80
Average Sentence Length:
18.33
Token Entropy:
4.67
Readability (ARI):
17.49

Reading Time

about 6 minutes