FR 2021-00909

Overview

Title

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meetings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council is having internet meetings to talk about fish and ocean projects. They will also have a time to hear new ideas and plans.

Summary AI

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council will hold public meetings via webinar on February 10 and 11, 2021. During these meetings, they will discuss topics like the North Atlantic Right Whale issues, aquaculture projects, river herring and shad issues, and updates on offshore wind activities. The sessions will also include a business session where reports and new business will be reviewed. People with disabilities requiring accommodations should contact Dr. Christopher Moore before the meeting.

Abstract

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold public meetings of the Council.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 3999
Document #: 2021-00909
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 3999-4000

AnalysisAI

The notice from the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC), as published in the Federal Register, announces upcoming public meetings to be held virtually via webinar. Scheduled for February 10 and 11, 2021, these meetings aim to address a variety of significant topics relevant to fishery management and environmental conservation.

General Summary

The meetings will focus on several key issues: the North Atlantic Right Whale, particularly concerning the reduction of large whale take, aquaculture opportunities and projects, river herring and shad management, as well as updates on offshore wind developments. Participants will also engage in a business session to review reports, organizational activities, and potentially new business. This setting provides a platform for public interaction and input on management strategies affecting marine species and habitats.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document content. Firstly, the agenda, while comprehensively outlined, includes technical terminology such as "Draft Batched Biological Opinion" and "EEZ Regional Aquaculture Projects," which could be challenging for the layperson to understand. This complexity might hinder meaningful public engagement.

Additionally, while the document establishes the framework for discussions, it does not articulate the impact that any decisions might have on individuals or organizations, raising transparency concerns. Another notable issue is the lack of details regarding potential financial implications of these meetings, particularly given their virtual nature. Moreover, the notice does not address alternatives for participation for those who lack internet access, potentially excluding a segment of the public.

Moreover, while the meetings open the floor for various discussions, the notice indicates that issues not explicitly mentioned may not be formally addressed, limiting stakeholders’ ability to influence these discussions.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the public benefits from the opportunity to participate in discussions affecting marine areas and resources they rely on for employment, recreation, or conservation interests. However, the document's complexity and lack of clarity could limit effective public engagement and understanding, potentially reducing its impact.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For those directly in the fishery industry or related sectors, these meetings provide critical insight and involvement opportunities in decision-making processes. However, given the document’s lack of specific procedural details, stakeholders might find it challenging to influence outcomes they find unfavorable.

Conversely, organizations focused on environmental conservation might view these meetings as a positive avenue to advocate for robust protections for species like the North Atlantic Right Whale and support sustainable practices in aquaculture, assuming they have the expertise to navigate the technical content.

In conclusion, while the public meetings of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council present an important opportunity for involvement in fisheries management, the document could be further refined to enhance accessibility, transparency, and public engagement. Addressing these issues could result in more inclusive and effective stakeholder participation.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any financial details, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The document lacks details on how any decisions made will impact specific organizations or individuals, which might obscure any favoritism.

  • • The description of the meeting agenda has a lot of technical terms (e.g., 'Draft Batched Biological Opinion', 'EEZ Regional Aquaculture Projects'), which may be difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • There is no clear explanation of procedures or next steps following the meeting, which could lead to ambiguity about outcomes.

  • • The notice does not mention if there are any expected expenses related to holding the webinar or any associated activities.

  • • There is no information provided about alternatives for those who might not have internet access to participate in the webinar.

  • • The document mentions that some issues may not be the subject of formal action, but it lacks clarity on whether or how stakeholders can influence those discussions.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 616
Sentences: 25
Entities: 51

Language

Nouns: 258
Verbs: 23
Adjectives: 23
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 35

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.20
Average Sentence Length:
24.64
Token Entropy:
5.15
Readability (ARI):
18.46

Reading Time

about 2 minutes