FR 2021-00781

Overview

Title

Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Cook Inlet Lease Sale 258

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is asking people what they think about a plan to look for oil and gas in Alaska's Cook Inlet. They want to make sure it won't harm animals and nature, and people can share their ideas about it online.

Summary AI

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has released a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Oil and Gas Lease Sale 258 in Alaska's Cook Inlet. This document is now open for public review and comment until March 1, 2021, with virtual public hearings scheduled for February 2021. The Draft EIS explores potential environmental impacts of the lease sale and considers alternatives to the proposal, focusing on protecting local wildlife and important ecological areas. Public feedback can be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal.

Abstract

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) announces the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) for the proposed Cook Inlet Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 258. This notice marks the start of the public review and comment period and serves to announce public hearings on the Draft EIS. After the public hearings and written comments on the Draft EIS have been reviewed and considered, a Final EIS will be prepared. The Draft EIS and associated information, including the Exploration, Development and Production, and Decommissioning Scenario (E&D Scenario) are available for review on the agency's website at https://www.boem.gov/ ak258.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 4117
Document #: 2021-00781
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 4117-4118

AnalysisAI

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has released a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) regarding a proposed oil and gas lease sale in Alaska's Cook Inlet, known as Lease Sale 258. This document is fundamentally a preliminary analysis aimed at understanding the possible environmental effects of granting rights to explore, develop, and potentially extract oil and gas resources from certain areas of the Cook Inlet. The lease proposal rolls into a larger federally approved leasing program running from 2017 to 2022. With the Draft EIS now available, the public is encouraged to review its contents and submit feedback through early March 2021. Virtual public hearings will also provide a platform for real-time commentary in February 2021.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable issue is the document's complexity, often employing technical jargon and extensive references to legal and regulatory frameworks that may not be easily digestible by a layperson. For example, terms like "OCS blocks" and citations of specific regulations might require further interpretation for those unacquainted with federal policy climates. Additionally, the Draft EIS lacks detailed financials or budget outlines for this endeavor, leaving questions concerning potential economic implications or unwarranted expenditures unanswered. Moreover, there's no specification of entities potentially benefitting from the sale, which could open the door to skepticism about favoritism.

The process for integrating public input into the final decision is not explicitly discussed, which may leave individuals questioning the transparency and effectiveness of the feedback process. A more detailed explanation might bolster public confidence that their comments will actively shape the final environmental assessments and resulting decisions.

Impact on the Public

This document has broad implications for residents of south-central Alaska, where the Cook Inlet is located. Environmental impacts analyzed in the Draft EIS could encompass issues as diverse as potential threats to local wildlife, changes in regional commercial fishing practices, and effects on Native subsistence zones. A careful examination of these potential impacts, juxtaposed with economic benefits from oil and gas developments, is at the core of the Draft EIS analysis.

Impact on Stakeholders

The proposed lease sale could significantly influence various groups. For commercial enterprises in the energy sector, Lease Sale 258 offers opportunities to bid for exploration and drilling rights in potentially resource-rich ocean blocks. Conversely, environmental and local advocacy groups may find the proposal worrisome, particularly regarding its potential to harm sensitive wildlife species like beluga whales and northern sea otters.

For the Native Villages of Nanwalek, Seldovia, and Port Graham, there is cautious optimism that their subsistence user areas will be preserved, as the Draft EIS indicates such zones might be deferred from leasing activities due to their cultural and ecological significance.

Conclusion

The Draft EIS is a foundational document that balances the interests of various stakeholders involved with the Cook Inlet Lease Proposal. While it provides a broad overview of potential environmental impacts and opportunities for public participation, its effectiveness relies upon clear communication and demonstrated responsiveness to public input. Stakeholders on all fronts should actively engage in this comment period to ensure their voices contribute to shaping a comprehensive and equitable final Environmental Impact Statement.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific information on the cost or budget related to the proposed Cook Inlet Lease Sale 258, making it difficult to evaluate potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no mention of specific organizations or individuals who might benefit from the lease sale, which could leave room for concerns about favoritism.

  • • The technical terms such as 'OCS blocks', 'E&D Scenario', 'cumulative environmental impacts', and references to specific CFR regulations, may be unclear to a general audience without specialized knowledge.

  • • The language could be seen as complex due to the use of legal and regulatory references, which may be difficult for the public to understand without further explanation.

  • • Details about how public comments will influence the final decision are not explicitly discussed, which could be seen as a lack of transparency.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,242
Sentences: 44
Entities: 111

Language

Nouns: 463
Verbs: 99
Adjectives: 73
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 59

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.86
Average Sentence Length:
28.23
Token Entropy:
5.33
Readability (ARI):
19.28

Reading Time

about 4 minutes