FR 2021-00725

The document from the Department of Education invites applications for the Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS) program for the fiscal year 2021. This program aims to support schools, particularly in high-poverty areas, by providing a range of services that integrate educational, social, and health resources. Schools are encouraged to collaborate with local educational agencies and community organizations to apply for funding by March 1, 2021. A key requirement is that applicants match the funds in their budget, demonstrating a commitment to sharing the financial responsibility.

General Summary

The program is designed to enhance the effectiveness of school-community partnerships by providing comprehensive services to children and families. The goal is to improve educational outcomes, health, and social well-being, particularly in underserved areas. Key entities eligible to apply include local educational agencies, the Bureau of Indian Education, and various community-based organizations. The program emphasizes collaboration among partners, an aspect vital to effectively deliver the intended services.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document presents a complex and technical list of definitions and requirements. This complexity might make it challenging for laypersons, or even educators and community members without legal backgrounds, to fully grasp the necessary details. The competitive preference priorities and the point allocation system are intricate, potentially making it difficult for applicants to clearly understand how to maximize their chances of receiving funding. Moreover, there is an overwhelming use of legal and regulatory references, which may not be easily understood by someone without a legal background.

Another concern is the clarity in specifying eligibility. Although the text outlines who can apply, the details surrounding nonprofit status and other eligibility criteria might require further clarification to ensure all potential applicants can determine their eligibility. Additionally, sections regarding indirect costs and administrative limitations contain terminologies that might be unfamiliar to many readers.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this initiative is aimed at supporting full-service community schools, which could have a positive impact on public education, especially in impoverished areas. By fostering partnerships and collaborations, the program could improve access to a variety of services that benefit students and families, potentially leading to better educational outcomes and a more healthy community environment.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For schools and educational agencies, the program offerings can provide crucial support and resources that might be unavailable otherwise, hence improving their service delivery. Conversely, the complexity of the application and the requirement to match funds might pose challenges for smaller or less-resourced organizations. These entities might find it difficult to navigate the administrative requirements or secure sufficient matching funds, potentially limiting their participation in the program.

For community-based organizations, the program offers an opportunity to work closely with schools to serve communities better. However, understanding and complying with the stringent requirements could be a hurdle unless simplified or adequately supported.

In conclusion, while the FSCS program offers promising opportunities for enhancing educational and community services in high-need areas, the complexity of the application process and the use of technical jargon may hinder its accessibility and effectiveness for potential applicants. Simplifying these elements could enhance participation and maximize the program’s impact.

The document under consideration pertains to the Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS) program and provides details on the financial allocations and spending associated with the grant opportunities for fiscal year 2021.

The estimated available funds for the program are $13,700,000. This total amount represents the funding pool from which grants will be awarded to qualifying applicants. Each grant is intended to support projects over the course of up to 60 months, with the estimated range of awards being between $275,000 and $500,000 for each 12-month budget period. Over the entire project period, lasting up to five years, the grants may total anywhere from $1,375,000 to $2,500,000. The estimated average size of awards is set at $450,000 for each year, suggesting a typical funding trajectory across the average grant lifespan.

There is a clearly stated maximum award limit of $2,500,000 for the whole project period, ensuring that the program maintains its budgetary constraints while maximizing the potential number of beneficiaries. Notably, there is also a minimum award requirement of $75,000 per year of the grant, as dictated by section 4625(d) of the ESEA. Applications proposing amounts below this threshold will be rejected, emphasizing the minimum viable funding necessary to support substantial project efforts.

The document also highlights considerations related to the evaluation and integrity of potential grantees. Among these considerations is a requirement for grantees whose awards might exceed $250,000 to undergo a judgment evaluation regarding their integrity, ethical business practices, and historical performance with previous Federal awards. This measure is part of a risk assessment meant to ensure funds are allocated to responsible entities capable of managing and implementing the projects effectively.

Furthermore, the document provides a caution for entities whose combined Federal funds, including this grant, surpass $10,000,000. These entities are required to report certain integrity information semiannually to the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), maintaining transparency and accountability in the use of Federal funds.

One of the identified issues within the document is the complexity inherent in the application process. The financial sections reference several technical terms, including cost-sharing or matching requirements and indirect cost rates, which may not be immediately clear to all potential applicants. Cost-sharing involves applicants providing matching funds, either in cash or in-kind donations, to supplement the Federal grant. This element of financial commitment underscores the importance of shared responsibility in ensuring the success of funded projects.

Indirect costs and administrative expenses are regulated under specific cost principles, which might necessitate additional clarification for applicants less familiar with federal grant management. Although there is a restricted indirect cost rate in use, the explicit nature of these regulations is not fully delineated in lay terms, which could add a layer of complexity for applicants.

Overall, the document outlines a robust financial framework for the FSCS program, emphasizing accountability and effective use of funds while also presenting challenges in terms of accessibility and clarity due to its technical nature.