Overview
Title
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The CDC wants to make some changes to a big health study because of COVID, like asking more questions over the phone, and they want to know what people think about these changes. They're asking everyone to share their thoughts to make sure the study is still helpful and fair.
Summary AI
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval of their National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which includes changes for 2021-2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These changes involve adjustments to survey design, interview modes, and examination procedures, such as conducting more phone interviews and adding COVID-related questions. The CDC invites public comments on the necessity, accuracy, and burden of this information collection effort and seeks to gather public feedback within 30 days of the notice publication. Participation in NHANES remains voluntary, and responses are kept confidential.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document is a notice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announcing their submission of a request for approval of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2021-2022. This survey, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), aims to gather extensive data on the health and nutrition status of the U.S. population. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, significant modifications have been proposed in the survey's procedures, methodologies, and content to ensure safety and relevancy in the current environment.
Summary of the Document
The CDC's NHANES survey is an essential tool designed to measure various health and nutrition parameters across different segments of the U.S. population. Normally conducted continuously, NHANES had to pause in 2020 due to the pandemic, marking the first interruption since 1999. For 2021-22, the CDC proposes changes including more phone interviews, new COVID-related questions, and modifications to laboratory and exam components. Public feedback is solicited on the necessity, effectiveness, and impact of these changes. Additionally, the survey plans to adjust its sampling strategy and not oversample based on race, origin, or income.
Significant Issues or Concerns
1. Cost and Budget Allocation:
The document does not provide details on the cost of the NHANES 2021-22 project or how the budget will be allocated. This lack of financial transparency might concern stakeholders looking to evaluate the project's efficiency and value.
2. Impact on Data Quality:
The decision not to oversample based on demographics such as race or income may affect the survey's ability to adequately represent the diversity of the U.S. population. An explanation of how these changes impact the survey's comprehensiveness and validity is notably absent.
3. Elimination of Certain Tests:
Several tests and procedures, such as oral health and auditory assessments, have been cycled out without a detailed rationale. These omissions could reduce the breadth of health data available from the survey, limiting its utility.
4. Consideration of Public Comments:
The document makes no mention of how previous public comments were integrated or addressed in this new proposal, presenting a concern about the public's role and influence in shaping this critical health survey.
5. Data Privacy Concerns:
With the collection of personally identifiable information (PII) from participants, there are potential privacy implications. Specific data security measures are not detailed, which may lead to apprehensions regarding how well participants' data is protected.
Impact on the Public
The NHANES survey has the potential to broadly influence public health policy by providing insights into health trends and nutrition in the United States. Nevertheless, changes in sampling strategy and content could impact the survey's ability to capture diverse health conditions across different population groups, potentially limiting its effectiveness in informing targeted health interventions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Public Health Officials and Policymakers:
These stakeholders rely on comprehensive and accurate data from NHANES to inform national health priorities and policies. Any limitations in data scope or representativeness could hinder their ability to address specific health disparities effectively.
Participants:
Participants, especially those who belong to demographics typically underrepresented in health statistics, might be affected by sampling changes. However, the survey aims to reduce participant burden through streamlined and safer data collection methods, which could positively influence participation rates during the pandemic.
Health Researchers:
The elimination or modification of certain tests may impact research studies that depend on these specific data points. Researchers will have to adapt to changes in data availability, which might delay analysis or require adjustments in research design.
This document, by announcing these proposed changes, opens a discussion on the ongoing evolution of health data collection during unique circumstances brought forth by global challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Engaging stakeholders in this dialogue is vital for ensuring NHANES continues to fulfill its important role in public health monitoring.
Issues
• The document does not specify the total cost of the NHANES 2021-22 project or how the budget is allocated.
• There is no detailed explanation of how the proposed changes, particularly those reducing the sample size and altering sampling methods (e.g., not oversampling based on race, Hispanic origin, or income), could impact data quality.
• The decision not to oversample based on race, Hispanic origin, or income lacks clarification on how it will affect diversity and representation in the data.
• No clear rationale is provided for cycling out certain tests and procedures (e.g., oral health, auditory tests, HPV swabs), which might impact the survey's comprehensiveness.
• There is no explicit explanation of how public comments from the previous notice were addressed or considered in the decision-making process.
• The document mentions collecting personally identifiable information (PII) but does not detail specific data security measures, which could raise privacy concerns.
• The term 'burden' regarding individuals' participation may be unclear to some readers, and there is insufficient explanation of how this burden is calculated.
• The language used to describe the technological and procedural changes is technical and might be difficult for the general public to fully understand.