FR 2021-00673

Overview

Title

60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes Grant Programs Assessment of the HUD Grants To Promote Coordination between Grantees of HUD's Lead Hazard Control Program and DOE's Weatherization Assistance Program

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to collect information to see if working together to fix homes is a good idea and helps people stay healthy. They’re asking everyone what they think about this plan and how it can be done in a way that's not too hard or costly.

Summary AI

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is seeking approval to collect information for a new assessment on improving home safety and quality. This will evaluate coordination between HUD's Lead Hazard Control Program and the Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program. They aim to discover if this collaboration results in cost savings and better health outcomes. HUD invites the public to comment on this proposal, focusing on its necessity, usefulness, and methods to minimize information collection burdens.

Abstract

HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 3173
Document #: 2021-00673
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 3173-3174

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register, titled "60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes Grant Programs Assessment of the HUD Grants To Promote Coordination between Grantees of HUD's Lead Hazard Control Program and DOE's Weatherization Assistance Program," outlines a request from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for public input on a proposed data collection initiative. This initiative aims to assess the collaborative efforts between HUD's Lead Hazard Control Program and the Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program. This proposal is part of HUD's ongoing efforts to improve home safety and quality by evaluating whether such collaborations yield cost savings and improved health outcomes.

General Summary

The notice informs that HUD is seeking comment on a new information collection to enhance the coordination between its programs and the Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program. HUD aims to collect data to prove whether joint efforts between these programs can lead to cost-efficiencies and better safety outcomes in homes. The public is invited to provide feedback within a 60-day comment period, focusing on the collection's necessity and how to minimize any burdens it might impose on respondents.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the absence of detailed cost estimates or a budget for the proposed data collection. Such details are crucial for stakeholders to assess if the resources allocated will be used effectively and if the project could avoid potential wasteful spending.

Another issue is the vague description of how the collected data will be used to improve coordination between the two programs. A clearer explanation could enhance understanding of the project's practical utility. Terms such as "cost savings and better outcomes" are also somewhat ambiguous, necessitating further clarification to ensure stakeholders have a concrete understanding of the expected benefits.

The document mentions a "burden" on program grantees and residential participants without specifying its nature or extent. This lack of detail makes it challenging to assess whether the burden is being fairly distributed among the stakeholders or if it might disproportionately impact certain groups.

Potential Impact on the Public

For the general public, successful coordination between HUD and the Department of Energy could result in safer and higher-quality homes, especially in energy efficiency and lead hazard reduction. However, clarity around the project's benefits and the proposed means of achieving them is vital to gain public support and understanding.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For grantees and property owners, the potential positive impact lies in improved operational efficiency and access to enhanced resources for home safety and weatherization. However, concerns regarding the administrative burden and lack of detailed outcomes could deter participation or lead to skepticism about the practical advantages of the initiative.

Residential property owners and renters might benefit from improved home environments if the program findings lead to enhanced service delivery models. Nevertheless, the document lacks specifics on how such outcomes will be clearly measured or achieved, which could influence the perceived value among these stakeholders.

By addressing these issues and concerns before implementation, HUD could significantly improve the document's clarity and the project's appeal and effectiveness, ensuring it benefits all involved parties.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on the estimated cost or budget for the proposed information collection, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The document lacks specificity on how the collected information will be used to achieve better coordination between HUD's Lead Hazard Control Program and DOE's Weatherization Assistance Program, which could lead to questions about the practical utility of the collection.

  • • The language regarding the coordination benefits and outcomes could be clearer. Phrases like 'cost savings and better outcomes' are somewhat vague and could benefit from more precise definitions.

  • • The term 'burden on the LHC and WAP grantees, and the residents' is used without a specific breakdown, making it challenging to evaluate the fairness or appropriate distribution of this burden among different parties.

  • • There is no explanation of how the coordination efforts will be measured or what metrics will be used to evaluate success, which raises concerns about the clarity and usefulness of the gathered data.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 897
Sentences: 27
Entities: 84

Language

Nouns: 339
Verbs: 56
Adjectives: 28
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 41

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.18
Average Sentence Length:
33.22
Token Entropy:
5.14
Readability (ARI):
23.03

Reading Time

about 3 minutes