FR 2021-00658

The recent notice issued by the U.S. Department of State, published in the Federal Register, addresses the temporary importation of culturally significant objects from abroad for display at an exhibition titled “Facing America: Mario Schifano 1960-1966.” This exhibition will be held at the Center for Italian Modern Art located in New York. The document underscores the importance of these artworks, suggesting their display is in the national interest of the United States. Essential details surrounding this decision have been provided by Marie Therese Porter Royce, Assistant Secretary of Educational and Cultural Affairs at the Department of State.

Summary of the Document

This notice primarily serves to inform the public about the Department of State's determinations concerning certain cultural objects being imported temporarily for the exhibition. The objects, hailing from international sources, are deemed culturally significant. Their display intends to enrich the American public's cultural understanding and appreciation. It is emphasized that the determinations have been made under various legal and regulatory authorities.

Significant Issues or Concerns

While the notice seeks to engage and inform the public, it is not without its shortcomings:

• Lack of Specific Details: The document does not provide specifics about the number of objects or their attributes, which limits the ability to assess the comprehensive cultural and financial impact.

• Financial Implications: Without clear information on the costs associated with the importation and display, the public cannot evaluate possible financial ramifications or the efficiency of the spending involved.

• Ambiguity in Defining National Interest: The criteria used to establish what constitutes the national interest and cultural significance remain undefined, potentially resulting in perceptions of ambiguity or lack of transparency.

• Potential for Preferential Treatment: The notice mentions the Center for Italian Modern Art as the primary exhibition venue, with no concrete plans for other locations, which could suggest preferential treatment or limited accessibility to the rest of the nation.

• Complex Legal Language: The document relies heavily on references to delegated authorities and statutes, which may not be easily understood by the general public, thereby potentially disengaging some readers.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document aims to enhance cultural education and appreciation across the United States by making international artworks temporarily available. This can foster a greater understanding of global art and cultural dynamics. However, the lack of detailed information may hinder public understanding and support for the exhibition and associated decisions.

Impact on Stakeholders

• Public and Art Enthusiasts: They gain an opportunity to experience culturally significant international artwork, enriching their cultural exposure and knowledge base.

• Cultural Institutions and Art Curators: These stakeholders may see a boost in public engagement and educational opportunities by providing exposure to esteemed international pieces.

• Taxpayers and Fiscal Watchdogs: The absence of financial clarity may raise concerns about the potential for extravagant spending without proper justification or transparency.

In conclusion, while the notice generally aims to promote cultural exchange and public engagement through art, it would benefit from providing more concrete details and transparency regarding the criteria for cultural significance and national interest, as well as the financial implications involved. This would help address public concerns and enhance understanding and support for such cultural initiatives.