FR 2021-00629

Overview

Title

Designation of Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakhan as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The State Department said that a man named Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakan is a big problem because he helps lead a bad group, so they decided to block all his money. They didn't tell him ahead of time so he wouldn't move the money before it gets blocked.

Summary AI

The State Department has designated Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakan, also known by several other names, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist under Executive Order 13224. This designation identifies him as a leader of the al-Qa'ida Kurdish Battalions, whose assets are subject to blocking. The decision was made to prevent providing prior notice to certain individuals due to concerns that it could undermine the effectiveness of the blocking measures. This notice was issued by Michael R. Pompeo and will be published in the Federal Register.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 3226
Document #: 2021-00629
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 3226-3226

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces the designation of Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakan as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. This action is taken under the authority established by various Executive Orders related to combating terrorism. Al-Shakan is identified as a leader of the al-Qa'ida Kurdish Battalions, a group known for its involvement in terrorism. As a result of this designation, all of his assets within the United States are blocked, and it is prohibited to engage in transactions with him.


General Summary

The designation of Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakan as a Global Terrorist is part of the U.S. government's ongoing efforts to combat international terrorism. The document, issued by the State Department, specifically highlights the blocking of assets as a primary tool in this fight. The goal of this measure is to limit financial and material support for activities associated with terrorism.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the key issues presented in the document is the use of multiple aliases for the individual in question. These aliases include Bilal al-Chamchamali, Bilal Kirkuki, and Mam Karim. Such use of various names could potentially cause confusion about the individual's identity. It's essential that these aliases are clearly documented elsewhere to prevent misunderstandings.

The document also references several Executive Orders without providing detailed explanations of these orders. This could require readers to conduct additional research to fully understand the implications of the designation and the mechanisms of asset blocking. Moreover, for those unfamiliar with the standard procedures under Executive Order 13224, the document does not offer a basic explanation of how property blocking works, which may lead to confusion.

Regarding the rationale behind not providing advance notice to the designated individual, the document explains this decision is made to ensure the effectiveness of the blocking measures. However, for readers not acquainted with the legal considerations, this explanation may not be entirely clear.

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, the document underscores the commitment of the U.S. government to curb terrorism and safeguard national security. By taking actions such as this designation, the government aims to hinder financial networks that support terrorist activities.

However, individuals hoping to understand the specific legal framework behind such measures may find the document lacking in detail. This could prompt calls for more accessible information on how such actions are decided and executed.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For individuals and entities within the United States, including financial institutions, this designation means they must comply with the added restrictions and ensure no transactions are executed with Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakan or his associated aliases. This poses a compliance burden but is viewed as an integral part of national security operations.

Organizations focusing on civil liberties might express concern over the opaque nature of such designations, particularly with the lack of prior notice provided to those designated. They might argue for greater transparency in the procedures employed.

On the other side, stakeholders advocating for stringent counter-terrorism measures likely perceive this document as a positive step, reinforcing the idea that the U.S. is proactive in dismantling support structures for terrorism.


In summary, the document reflects the intricate balance between national security and individual rights, highlighting the complexities involved in international counter-terrorism efforts.

Issues

  • • The document uses multiple aliases for the individual in question, which could cause confusion or ambiguity if not clearly documented elsewhere.

  • • The language refers to several Executive Orders which are not explained within the text, potentially requiring additional research to understand fully.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with the mechanisms of property blocking under Executive Order 13224 without providing a basic explanation, which might make it difficult for those not versed in government procedures.

  • • The rationale for not providing prior notice to the designated person is given, but the explanation may not be sufficiently detailed for those unfamiliar with the specific legal considerations involved.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 285
Sentences: 6
Entities: 30

Language

Nouns: 87
Verbs: 22
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.52
Average Sentence Length:
47.50
Token Entropy:
4.55
Readability (ARI):
27.32

Reading Time

about a minute or two