FR 2021-00561

Overview

Title

Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Pacific Fishery Management Council is having online meetings from March 2-5 and 8-11, 2021, to talk about how to take care of fish and their homes. People can watch the meetings online, but on the morning of March 4, they will have a private meeting.

Summary AI

The Pacific Fishery Management Council and its advisory groups will conduct public meetings online from March 2-5 and 8-11, 2021. The meetings will discuss a range of topics related to fishery management, including habitat issues, salmon management, and ecosystem management. Meetings are open to the public, with a closed session scheduled for the morning of March 4 to discuss litigation and personnel matters. Participants can attend via live stream, with details available on the Pacific Council's website.

Abstract

The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Pacific Council) and its advisory entities will hold online public meetings.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2641
Document #: 2021-00561
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2641-2643

AnalysisAI

The notice from the National Marine Fisheries Service, a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Commerce Department, outlines a series of public meetings to be held online by the Pacific Fishery Management Council and its advisory entities. These meetings, scheduled between March 2-5 and 8-11, 2021, are designed to cover a broad array of topics related to fishery management, such as habitat issues, salmon and halibut management, and overall ecosystem management. The agenda notably includes both open sessions available to the public and a closed session on March 4 to handle sensitive matters such as litigation and personnel issues. All sessions are accessible via webinar, with further details provided on the Council's website.

General Summary

The document provides an informational overview about upcoming meetings of the Pacific Fishery Management Council intended to manage and conserve fishery resources. The Council, which works to regulate fishing activities and protect marine environments, will hold several days of discussions, and the public is welcome to attend most sessions remotely. The meetings reflect a structured approach, listing agenda items and involving various advisory subpanels, including those on coastal species, highly migratory species, and groundfish.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One concern is the dense and bureaucratic language found in the document. Such language might hinder the general public's understanding, potentially leaving them unaware of the importance or specifics of the meetings. Additionally, while the agenda is comprehensive, it lacks clear prioritization or time allocation for each topic. This could lead to inefficient use of time during meetings if discussions extend beyond what is necessary without a proper framework for prioritization.

Furthermore, while the notice mentions special accommodations for those needing assistance, the information about obtaining these accommodations is brief and buried towards the end. This crucial accessibility information might be easily overlooked, possibly excluding those who require additional support from participating.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, these meetings are a chance to engage with and understand the decisions that affect marine ecosystems and, consequently, fisheries and related industries. Open access may enhance transparency and community involvement in decision-making processes. However, the heavy use of technical jargon and the extensive meeting schedule without clear-for-the-public outcomes might deter active public participation.

Impact on Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as fishery managers, environmental organizations, and local communities relying on these resources, will find these meetings particularly pertinent. For these groups, discussions around management alternatives and regulatory measures could significantly impact economic activities, conservation efforts, and livelihood sustainably. The comprehensive approach allows stakeholders to present concerns and hear updates on pressing issues, although the lack of specificity and prioritization might also be a point of frustration if key issues do not receive adequate attention.

In conclusion, while the document efficiently outlines the organizational side of the upcoming meetings, it could improve by focusing on clarity, accessibility, and prioritization. Broader public and stakeholder engagement would benefit from addressing these areas, leading to more effective conservation and management of fishery resources.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any specific funding or spending details, so it's unclear whether there is any potential wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The language of the document is dense and filled with bureaucratic terms that might be difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • The document outlines a schedule for meetings that spans several days, but it could provide more clarity about the purpose or expected outcomes of these meetings to justify their extensive duration.

  • • There is a detailed list of agenda items but no indication of prioritization or how long each item will be discussed, which might lead to inefficiencies.

  • • Special accommodations are mentioned but the process for requesting them is mentioned only briefly at the end of the document, which might be easily overlooked.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 1,782
Sentences: 79
Entities: 195

Language

Nouns: 781
Verbs: 73
Adjectives: 40
Adverbs: 26
Numbers: 141

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.04
Average Sentence Length:
22.56
Token Entropy:
5.21
Readability (ARI):
16.77

Reading Time

about 6 minutes