FR 2021-00553

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Individual Fishing Quotas for Pacific Halibut and Sablefish in the Alaska Fisheries

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to know what people think about how they manage certain types of fish caught in Alaska. They are asking everyone to share their thoughts to help make the rules better and easier for people who catch the fish.

Summary AI

The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is seeking public feedback on the proposed information collection for the Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQ) for Pacific Halibut and Sablefish in Alaska. The IFQ Program aims to provide economic stability and manage these fisheries effectively, supporting coastal communities while protecting small-scale fishers. Public comments are invited until March 15, 2021, and individuals or organizations can submit their thoughts via email. The collection includes various forms and requirements to manage permits and quota shares effectively, and the feedback will help evaluate and improve the program's utility and reduce the reporting burden.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2644
Document #: 2021-00553
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2644-2646

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a public notice issued by the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), inviting comments on the proposed information collection regarding Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQ) for Pacific Halibut and Sablefish in Alaska. This notice is part of the Paperwork Reduction Act efforts to collect public input that can help streamline regulatory requirements and minimize burdens on respondents. Public comments are requested by March 15, 2021, and submissions can be sent via email.

General Summary

NOAA is seeking feedback on the information collection practices for the IFQ Program. This program is designed to ensure the sustainable management of Pacific Halibut and Sablefish fisheries, promoting economic stability for coastal communities and fostering responsible use and harvest of these species. The process includes a system that limits access to these fisheries to those who hold quota shares, which can be transferred or leased under strict regulations. Information collection is crucial for managing permits, tracking quota shares, and ensuring compliance with program requirements. The document outlines the current methods of information collection and invites suggestions on possible improvements.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the major concerns arises from the technical nature of the document. It includes legal jargon and references to specific acts like the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the Northern Pacific Halibut Act, which could be challenging for the general public to fully understand. The lack of simplified explanations could impede effective public engagement.

Moreover, while the notice seeks public comment, it should also highlight how this feedback will influence or contribute to the decision-making process. Transparency in how public input will be used is crucial for encouraging participation. Privacy concerns also arise due to the disclosure that personal identifying information submitted in comments may be made publicly available.

Impact on the Public

For the broader public, this notice represents an opportunity to participate in the regulatory process concerning marine resource management. Individuals, organizations, or businesses involved in the fisheries can provide insights that could shape the future framework of these regulations.

The estimated impact on respondents, quantified by the number of respondents (2,559) and the estimated annual cost ($21,471), provides a sense of the program's reach and the financial burden involved. However, without further details, it is challenging for the public to assess the scope of these figures.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The stakeholders most directly affected by this notice include individuals and businesses involved in the Pacific Halibut and Sablefish fisheries in Alaska. For these stakeholders, the data collection and subsequent regulations could either pose additional bureaucratic hurdles or provide clearer, more efficient pathways to maintain compliance with fisheries management rules.

Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program participants may also be impacted, as some aspects of the IFQ Program intersect with the requirements and goals of the CDQ, which aims to benefit Western Alaska communities.

For small-scale fishers and new entrants into the fishing industry, the IFQ Program’s ownership caps and vessel use caps could be beneficial in protecting their interests against larger, consolidating entities. The notice’s emphasis on sustainable management and program improvements could have positive long-term outcomes for these communities. However, these groups may face challenges navigating complex application processes and regulatory frameworks, thus consistent and effective communication from NOAA will be critical.

Overall, while the document underscores the significance of public participation and provides a pathway for impact, clarity in the process and the outcomes of public commentary will be essential for truly engaging and benefiting the stakeholders involved.

Financial Assessment

The Federal Register document discusses the information collection activities related to Pacific Halibut and Sablefish Individual Fishing Quotas in Alaska. It includes a financial reference indicating the estimated total annual cost to the public as $21,471. This figure appears in the context of the economic burden estimated for conducting this data collection.

The $21,471 figure refers to the aggregate costs incurred by the public, particularly those involved in the IFQ program, as part of their obligation to comply with these data submission requirements. This amount could cover various administrative expenses such as the completion and submission of forms, applications, and reports necessary to participate in or comply with the IFQ program.

One of the identified issues in the document is the potential significant burden these costs might represent, especially given the estimated number of respondents is 2,559. This implies an average cost per respondent that may need careful consideration to ensure it is not overly burdensome for individuals or organizations participating in the program.

While the document presents an opportunity for public comment, it also raises concerns around the transparency of how these financial burdens are calculated and how public feedback might influence future regulatory financial commitments. Such information is crucial for participants to understand how engaging with this commentary process might alleviate or clarify their financial responsibilities under the program.

Moreover, the lack of an explicit breakdown of what the $21,471 encompasses—be it filing fees, administrative processing, or other incidental costs—makes it difficult for stakeholders to assess the reasonableness of the financial impacts. Addressing this issue with more detailed financial information could enhance clarity and help mitigate concerns regarding the economic implications for those participating in the IFQ Program.

Issues

  • • The document contains technical and legal jargon that may be difficult for the general public to understand. For example, the detailed description of regulations and legal acts like the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the Northern Pacific Halibut Act may not be easily comprehensible to laypersons.

  • • The document could benefit from a section that summarizes key points or provides a simplified explanation of the information collection process and its importance.

  • • The estimated number of respondents (2,559) and the estimated total annual cost to the public ($21,471) may suggest that this collection has a significant burden. However, without specific details on what these costs involve, it's challenging for reviewers to assess the potential financial impact on respondents.

  • • The notice invites public comment but also notes that comments, including personal identifying information, may be made public. This may deter individuals from providing feedback due to privacy concerns.

  • • There is no clear explanation of how the feedback from the public comments will be used or if it will significantly impact the decision-making process.

  • • The document mentions several different programs and acts but does not provide a comprehensive overview of how they interrelate, which may lead to confusion.

  • • The text mentions 'eFISH', an online Fisheries Information System, without explaining its role in the process clearly, which could be problematic for those unfamiliar with the system.

  • • While the roles of NOAA and NMFS are delineated, the document does not clearly specify the roles and responsibilities of other agencies or stakeholders involved in the IFQ Program.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 1,830
Sentences: 65
Entities: 153

Language

Nouns: 725
Verbs: 132
Adjectives: 85
Adverbs: 17
Numbers: 64

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.34
Average Sentence Length:
28.15
Token Entropy:
5.53
Readability (ARI):
21.42

Reading Time

about 7 minutes