Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Alaska Chinook Salmon Economic Data Reports (EDR)
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government wants to know what people think about how they collect information to help protect a type of fish called Chinook salmon. They’re asking people to share their thoughts and ideas for 60 days, to make sure their way of getting information is helpful and not too hard for people to do.
Summary AI
The Department of Commerce is inviting the public and other federal agencies to comment on the Chinook Salmon Economic Data Report (EDR) Program managed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). This program collects data to help assess how well measures to reduce bycatch of Chinook salmon in the Bering Sea pollock fishery are working. They are renewing the information collection process which includes three forms: the Compensated Transfer Report, Vessel Fuel Survey, and Vessel Master Survey. Public comments are open for 60 days, and the information gathered will aid in enhancing the quality and utility of the data collected while minimizing reporting burdens.
Abstract
The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register invites commentary from the public and other federal agencies concerning the Chinook Salmon Economic Data Report (EDR) Program, managed by the National Marine Fisheries Service under the Department of Commerce. Specifically, this program is designed to collect data on the bycatch of Chinook salmon in the Bering Sea pollock fishery. The information obtained is crucial for evaluating measures intended to reduce bycatch as part of broader environmental and fishery management efforts.
General Overview
The Chinook Salmon EDR Program is instrumental in supporting policies that aim to manage and sustain fish populations, particularly focusing on the unintended capture, known as bycatch, of Chinook salmon during pollock fishing in the Bering Sea. The data collected assists in understanding and enhancing bycatch management strategies. The current call for comments is part of a routine renewal process that involves collecting data through three forms: the Compensated Transfer Report, the Vessel Fuel Survey, and the Vessel Master Survey.
Significant Issues and Concerns
1. Cost Transparency:
A notable concern is the absence of detailed information regarding the costs associated with the administration and auditing of the Chinook Salmon EDR Program. Without transparency in financial reporting, stakeholders may question the efficiency of fund allocation which could potentially mask wasteful spending.
2. Data Security:
As the data collected includes sensitive business information, there is a lack of specific measures addressing how data security and privacy will be safeguarded during its collection and submission. This omission may raise concerns among participants about the confidentiality of their input.
3. Compliance Clarity:
The document lacks a clear definition of what constitutes 'gross noncompliance', which is necessary for fair and consistent enforcement. This ambiguity could lead to potential discrepancies in compliance checks and audits, leaving participants uncertain about the criteria they need to meet.
4. Complexity of Language:
Terms like 'prohibited species catch (PSC)' and 'In-season Compensated Transfer Report' may not be immediately clear to those outside the fishing industry. This complexity could hinder public understanding and discourage comprehensive feedback from a broader audience.
5. Methodology for Burden Estimates:
The document does not elaborate on the methodology used to estimate the time and effort required by respondents, which is crucial for verifying the accuracy of these estimates. Clarity in this area would enhance trust in the data collection process.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact:
For the general public, this process symbolizes a step towards more sustainable fishing practices which align with environmental conservation interests. Public involvement through comments can lead to improvements in how data is collected and used, ensuring that policies reflect broad societal values and concerns.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders:
For stakeholders directly involved in the Bering Sea pollock fishery, such as vessel owners and operators, this program represents both a regulatory burden and an opportunity to contribute to effective fishery management. Positive impacts include the potential for enhanced fishery sustainability and profitability in the long term. However, without clear guidelines and transparency in program execution, these stakeholders face potential operational challenges and compliance uncertainty.
In summary, while the Chinook Salmon EDR Program appears poised to contribute to responsible fishery management, attention to transparency, security, and clarity could greatly enhance stakeholder engagement and public trust. By addressing these concerns, the Department of Commerce can ensure that its data collection efforts are both efficient and effective in supporting the intended environmental and economic objectives.
Financial Assessment
The document mentions an "Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0." This indicates that there are no direct costs imposed on the public for participating in the information collection activities related to the Chinook Salmon Economic Data Report (EDR) Program. This essentially means that individuals or businesses participating in the data collection process are not required to pay any fees or incur expenses directly attributed to this program's submission requirements.
However, while the estimated cost to the public is explicitly stated as zero, there is no detailed breakdown of the costs associated with the administration and auditing of the Chinook Salmon EDR Program itself. This lack of specific financial information, especially regarding the operational costs carried by the government entities involved, could lead to concerns about the potential for unreported or inefficient spending. The absence of this financial detail results in one of the identified issues: the lack of transparency regarding potential wasteful spending.
Moreover, the document does not mention how financial aspects, such as administrative costs or resource allocations for audits, are managed to ensure efficiency and accountability. The identified issue regarding ambiguity in enforcement and auditing processes, particularly how "gross noncompliance" is determined, may also have financial implications that are not addressed.
Finally, while the document anticipates public comments on the data collection process's burden, further transparency in the financial operations could enhance public trust and participation. Clearly detailing how costs are managed and outlining any financial measures in place to ensure cost-effectiveness would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the program's financial impact and address potential concerns about oversight in the use of public funds.
In summary, while the document asserts no direct cost to the public, it could benefit from a clearer explanation of the financial aspects related to the program's administration and enforcement to address gaps in transparency and accountability.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific information on the costs involved with the administration and auditing of the Chinook Salmon EDR Program, which could lead to a lack of transparency regarding potential wasteful spending.
• There is no mention of any specific measures to ensure data security during the collection and submission of the reports, which could be a concern for individuals providing sensitive business information.
• The document does not clarify how 'gross noncompliance' will be determined, which could lead to ambiguity in enforcement and auditing processes.
• Language such as 'prohibited species catch (PSC)' and 'In-season Compensated Transfer Report' might be complex for those unfamiliar with fishing industry regulations, potentially limiting public understanding of the document.
• The methodology and assumptions used to estimate the burden hours are not clearly explained, which may affect the accuracy and transparency of the document's reported figures.