FR 2021-00512

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released a notice regarding several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. These filings involve proposed changes from different companies, including Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Southern LNG Company, Elba Express Company, and Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline. The notice is detailed in the Federal Register, with the publication date of January 13, 2021.

Summary of the Document

The document outlines amendments and updates in cash management agreements or rate clarifications filed by various natural gas pipeline companies. These updates may involve what is referred to as a "housekeeping filing," although the document does not clarify whether these are simply administrative updates or more complex changes. The public, as well as interested stakeholders, have until January 19, 2021, to submit comments or interventions regarding these filings.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the significant issues in the notice is the lack of specificity regarding what the "housekeeping filing" entails. The term is vague and does not offer insight into whether the updates are trivial or could have financial or operational impacts. Moreover, the repetitive mention of "Cash Management Agreement" amendments is not accompanied by an explanation of how these amendments differ across the entities or what they aim to achieve.

Additionally, the document references rules and procedures for intervention and protest—Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations—without providing further guidance. This could present a challenge to those unfamiliar with FERC’s complex regulatory landscape.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the implications of these filings may not be immediately apparent due to the technical nature and limited context provided. However, changes to natural gas pipeline rates and management agreements could have downstream effects, potentially influencing energy prices or service reliability. Public engagement is encouraged, yet the document might intimidate those not well-versed in regulatory procedures.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved, such as energy companies, contractors, and regulatory bodies, these filings could have significant implications. Companies may experience operational changes or adjustments in their financial management systems depending on the specific amendments to cash management agreements.

From a regulatory standpoint, these filings are essential for ensuring compliance and transparency within the energy industry. However, the lack of detailed information might hinder stakeholders from fully understanding the potential impacts, potentially leading to challenges in preparing for these changes. Stakeholders with deeper knowledge and resources are likely better positioned to engage effectively compared to smaller entities or those with limited regulatory experience.

Conclusion

While the notice from FERC provides essential information regarding upcoming changes in natural gas pipeline regulations, its technical language and lack of detailed context might limit accessibility and engagement from the public and smaller stakeholders. Transparency and clarity are critical in such notices to ensure comprehensive understanding and participation from all interested parties.