FR 2021-00509

Overview

Title

Fuels of the Future Advisory Board

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Energy is starting a new group called the Fuels of the Future Advisory Board to help them come up with new kinds of fuel, like special plant fuels or super clean gas, and get advice from different experts.

Summary AI

The Department of Energy is planning to create the Fuels of the Future Advisory Board (FoFAB). This new board will offer advice and suggestions to the Secretary of Energy about developing alternative fuels. The FoFAB will play an important role in advising on research and development for projects like bioenergy and hydrogen fuel cells. It aims to gather a diverse group of experts and community members to guide these efforts.

Abstract

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in accordance with Title 41, Code of Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Fuels of the Future Advisory Board (FoFAB) will be established. The FoFAB will provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy concerning the development of alternative fuels throughout the Department of Energy. Additionally, the establishment of the Board has been determined to be essential to the conduct of the Department's business and to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The Board will operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2664
Document #: 2021-00509
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2664-2664

AnalysisAI

The Department of Energy has announced the creation of the Fuels of the Future Advisory Board (FoFAB). This advisory board is established under the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Its primary purpose is to offer guidance and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on the development and implementation of alternative fuel initiatives throughout the Department. These initiatives might encompass a broad range of energy research and development programs focused on alternative fuels like bioenergy, methane hydrates, and hydrogen fuel cells.

Summary of the Document

The document provides an official notice from the Department of Energy regarding its intention to create the Fuels of the Future Advisory Board. The board is expected to continue indefinitely and consists of a balanced group of community representatives and technical experts. These members will provide input on prioritizing and enhancing various alternative fuel projects to meet the energy needs of the future.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are a few notable concerns with the document's content and presentation:

  1. Non-Specific Funding and Goals: The document does not specify any budget or funding allocations for the board. Without this information, it is difficult to gauge how resources will be used effectively or if there might be potential waste or favoritism. Additionally, the document discusses a wide range of potential programs but lacks specific goals or performance metrics. This absence might lead to inefficient or unfocused use of resources.

  2. Language Complexity: The document includes technical and bureaucratic language, with numerous legal references that could be challenging for the general public to comprehend. Simplifying these sections would enhance transparency and accessibility for those interested in the department's activities.

  3. Inconsistencies in Contact Information: The formatting of the contact information is inconsistent. This might hinder accessibility for individuals looking to engage with or seek more information about the advisory board's activities.

Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

The establishment of the FoFAB reflects a significant step towards addressing future energy demands by focusing on alternative fuels. If effectively implemented, the advisory board's recommendations could lead to cleaner, more sustainable energy sources that could benefit the public by reducing environmental pollution and providing more efficient fuel options.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  1. Technical Experts and Community Representatives: These individuals stand to gain an influential platform to impact national energy policy. Their engagement in the advisory board could allow them to shape future energy initiatives directly.

  2. Alternative Fuel Industry: Companies and researchers within this sector may receive increased attention and funding opportunities as the Department of Energy focuses on research and development in alternative fuels. However, the lack of specified goals or metrics might also lead to uncertainty about the types of projects or innovations the Department will prioritize.

  3. Environmental Advocates: This group's interest in promoting renewable and clean energy could align well with the board's focus on alternative fuels. Nonetheless, advocates might be concerned about the potential lack of specific accountability measures or performance targets.

In summary, while the creation of the FoFAB presents promising opportunities for future alternative fuel development, its broad and non-specific framework may require further refinement to ensure efficient resource allocation and clear public communication.

Issues

  • • The document does not mention a specific budget or funding allocation for the Fuels of the Future Advisory Board (FoFAB), making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The description of the FoFAB's activities is broad and includes many potential programs, but lacks specific project goals or metrics for success, which could lead to inefficient allocation of resources.

  • • The repeated phrase 'in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act' could be simplified or expanded upon to provide clearer understanding.

  • • The document contains a lot of bureaucratic language and legal references that might be difficult for the general public to understand, reducing transparency.

  • • The contact information section is not formatted consistently, with extra spaces around the email address, which might hinder accessibility.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 535
Sentences: 20
Entities: 47

Language

Nouns: 193
Verbs: 28
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 19

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.03
Average Sentence Length:
26.75
Token Entropy:
4.72
Readability (ARI):
19.32

Reading Time

about a minute or two