FR 2021-00508

The document announces the termination of three advisory committees under the Department of Energy. These committees, specifically focused on biomass research, methane hydrate, and hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, are officially concluded as of January 7, 2021.

General Summary

The Department of Energy (DOE) has taken steps to dissolve three of its Federal Advisory Committees—namely, the Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee, the Methane Hydrate Advisory Committee, and the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee. These entities were in place to provide expert guidance and recommendations on their respective areas of energy technology. The decision was formalized under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act, which govern the creation, operation, and dissolution of such advisory bodies.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The termination of these committees may raise concerns about the DOE's commitment to advancing renewable energy and clean technologies. These committees were platforms that brought together various stakeholders, including scientific experts, industry leaders, and policymakers, to collaborate and advise on the development of alternative energy resources. Their dissolution suggests a shift in focus or reallocation of resources, which may either streamline or hinder progress in these sectors.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the cessation of these committees might imply potential changes in priorities or policy directions within the DOE. As these committees were focused on sustainable and innovative energy resources, their termination may impact national efforts to transition to cleaner energy solutions. There can be concerns about how this affects energy policy and environmental objectives, including carbon reduction goals and climate change mitigation efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders most directly affected by this decision include the researchers, industries, and companies involved in biomass, methane hydrate, and hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. For them, these committees served as crucial avenues for collaboration and influence over strategic directions. Their dissolution could result in reduced advocacy or support for initiatives in these areas, affecting funding opportunities, research advancements, and commercial applications.

Organizations and entities focused on promoting sustainable energy may view this dissolution negatively if they see it as a loss of governmental support and focus. Conversely, some stakeholders may interpret this as a move towards consolidating and streamlining DOE’s focus, leading to potentially more efficient allocation of resources to priority areas.

In conclusion, while the termination of these committees signifies an administrative change, it will likely influence both public perception and the operational dynamics among stakeholders in the fields of biomass, methane hydrate, and hydrogen technologies. Whether this constitutes a setback or sheds light on new ways forward remains to be seen, contingent upon any ensuing policy or strategic decisions by the DOE.