FR 2021-00390

Overview

Title

Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles

Agencies

ELI5 AI

NHTSA wants people to help them make cars safer from computer problems by sharing ideas on a new set of suggestions. These ideas are meant to help car companies keep cars' technology safe, though following them is up to each company.

Summary AI

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is asking for public comments on their updated draft document, Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles. This document is a revision of their 2016 guidance and focuses on improving vehicle cybersecurity with an emphasis on safety. NHTSA's recommendations are voluntary and aim to guide the automotive industry in managing cybersecurity risks in motor vehicles. The Agency is seeking feedback on the draft update, which includes new best practices addressing evolving cybersecurity challenges in vehicle electronics, software, and wireless connectivity.

Abstract

NHTSA invites public comment on the Agency's updated draft cybersecurity best practices document titled Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles. In 2016, NHTSA issued its first edition, Cybersecurity Best Practices for Modern Vehicles, which described NHTSA's nonbinding guidance to the automotive industry for improving vehicle cybersecurity. With this document, NHTSA is docketing and soliciting public feedback on a draft update based on the knowledge gained through prior comments, continued research, motor vehicle cybersecurity issues discovered by researchers, and related industry activities over the past four years. To emphasize NHTSA's safety mission, recommendations in the document focus on cybersecurity best practices that have safety implications for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2481
Document #: 2021-00390
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2481-2486

AnalysisAI

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recently published an updated draft document for public comment titled Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles. This document serves as a follow-up to the guidance initially introduced in 2016, focusing on enhancing vehicle cybersecurity with an emphasis on safety. The NHTSA is seeking input from the public and industry stakeholders to refine the best practices in response to the evolving cybersecurity landscape in vehicle electronics, software, and wireless connectivity.

General Summary

NHTSA’s updated draft document outlines voluntary guidelines intended to assist the automotive industry in addressing cybersecurity risks associated with motor vehicles. By emphasizing safety and security, the Agency aims to foster improvements in the design, manufacturing, and maintenance of vehicles in relation to their electronic and software systems. This collaborative approach allows stakeholders, including manufacturers and suppliers, to adapt practices that mitigate potential cyber threats throughout a vehicle's lifecycle.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The draft document includes complex terminology and references numerous technical standards and methodologies, such as ISO/SAE 21434 and NISTIR 8151. This may present challenges for stakeholders who are not deeply familiar with cybersecurity language and may require additional research to fully comprehend and implement the recommendations. Another issue is the dense and expansive nature of the text, which could obstruct some stakeholders' ability to quickly identify and focus on the most pertinent sections for their specific needs.

NHTSA's analysis of the economic implications acknowledges a lack of detailed knowledge about organizational costs and cybersecurity maturity levels, potentially affecting the accuracy of their cost assessment. Moreover, the guidance's voluntary nature might result in inconsistent adoption across the automotive industry, potentially limiting the effectiveness of the proposed best practices.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document represents an effort to make vehicles safer by reducing cybersecurity risks. As modern vehicles become increasingly complex and interconnected, the threat of cyber attacks grows, potentially affecting passenger safety and privacy. By guiding the automotive industry towards better cybersecurity practices, NHTSA aims to ensure that vehicles on the road are better protected against these emerging threats.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • Automotive Manufacturers and Suppliers: The guidance offers a framework for these stakeholders to improve their cybersecurity systems, thereby minimizing risks and potential liabilities associated with cyber vulnerabilities. Companies that engage with these guidelines may benefit from a stronger public image and increased consumer trust.

  • Policy Makers and Regulatory Bodies: The document provides an opportunity to gauge the effectiveness and acceptance of voluntary standards within the industry, which could inform future regulatory policies that ensure public safety.

Negative Impacts:

  • Smaller Companies: For companies with less mature cybersecurity programs, the extensive recommendations may seem overwhelming and could require substantial adjustments to current practices, involving both time and financial resources.

  • Stakeholders Concerned with Consistency: The non-binding nature of the guidance means that some entities might delay implementation or opt for different standards, potentially leading to uneven cybersecurity levels across the industry, which could undermine the collective safety effort.

Overall, NHTSA’s document underscores the importance of advancing cybersecurity measures in modern vehicles to protect public safety, but highlights several challenges that stakeholders will need to navigate in adopting and implementing these best practices.

Issues

  • • The document contains complex language that might be difficult for readers who are not well-versed in cybersecurity terms, such as references to various technical practices and methodologies (e.g., ISO/SAE 21434, NISTIR 8151).

  • • The text is very dense and extensive, which may hinder the ability of some stakeholders to identify the most critical sections relevant to them.

  • • There are numerous references to external documents, standards, and frameworks which could make it difficult for readers to understand the document without additional research.

  • • The economic analysis section acknowledges a lack of detailed knowledge of organizational costs and cybersecurity maturity, which may limit the accuracy of the potential cost assessment.

  • • The voluntary nature of the guidance could lead to inconsistent adoption across the industry, possibly undermining the effectiveness of the best practices.

  • • The document mentions that some recommendations cannot currently be mapped to industry standards, which may create ambiguity or uncertainty for entities attempting to implement them.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 6
Words: 6,617
Sentences: 239
Entities: 415

Language

Nouns: 2,205
Verbs: 606
Adjectives: 411
Adverbs: 138
Numbers: 220

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.81
Average Sentence Length:
27.69
Token Entropy:
6.05
Readability (ARI):
23.45

Reading Time

about 26 minutes