FR 2021-00356

Overview

Title

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Organix, Inc.

Agencies

ELI5 AI

Organix, Inc. wants permission from the government to make certain copies of cannabis and its main chemical for their research. People have until March 15, 2021, to say if they think it's a good or bad idea.

Summary AI

Organix, Inc. has applied to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to become a registered producer of certain controlled substances, specifically synthetic versions of Marihuana and Tetrahydrocannabinol. The notice invites comments or objections from existing registered manufacturers and applicants by March 15, 2021. Requests for a hearing on the application must also be submitted by this date. Written feedback should be directed to the DEA in Springfield, Virginia.

Abstract

Organix, Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2457
Document #: 2021-00356
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2457-2458

AnalysisAI

Organix, Inc., a company based in Woburn, Massachusetts, has made a move to be recognized legally as a bulk manufacturer of certain controlled substances. This involves being registered by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Justice, which oversees the regulation and enforcement of narcotic and other controlled substances. The specific substances in question are synthetic versions of Marihuana and Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The application process is now open for feedback, and the public is encouraged to submit their comments or objections by March 15, 2021.

Key Issues and Concerns

One significant aspect of the document is its use of specific drug codes, namely 7360 for Marihuana and 7370 for Tetrahydrocannabinol, without explaining these codes in terms that are easily understandable. People unfamiliar with these codes might find the document inaccessible and confusing.

Moreover, while the document states that Organix, Inc. intends to produce "synthetics," it does not specify what this term means. This lack of detailed description could lead to ambiguity and misunderstandings among readers concerning what precisely the company plans to manufacture.

Another missing element is an explanation of the scale or scope of the manufacturing operations. Details about potential economic impacts or the volume of production could be crucial for stakeholders assessing the implications of this application, but these details are not provided.

In addition, the document does not discuss why Organix, Inc. is an appropriate or qualified candidate for becoming a bulk manufacturer. Information on the company's expertise, capabilities, or past experiences in dealing with controlled substances might have provided valuable insights.

Finally, while the procedures for submitting comments or objections are outlined, there is no guidance on the criteria for such submissions. This might make it challenging for interested parties to understand how to formulate their feedback effectively.

Broad Impact

For the general public, this document may have varying degrees of importance depending on their views or involvement with controlled substances like synthetic marihuana and THC. On the one hand, it reflects a regulatory process that ensures such substances are manufactured under stringent legal guidelines. On the other hand, there could be concerns about safety, legality, and moral questions surrounding the manufacturing of synthetic drugs.

Impact on Stakeholders

For existing registered manufacturers or those looking to enter this market, Organi्सx, Inc.'s application could represent new competition or collaboration opportunities. These stakeholders might be keenly interested in the outcomes of this application process and how it impacts market dynamics.

For regulatory bodies and enforcement agencies, ensuring that operations comply with legal frameworks is paramount. The registration process serves as a checkpoint to maintain industry standards.

From an industry perspective, the acceptance of Organix, Inc.'s application could contribute positively by adding to the supply chain of synthetic marihuana and THC, potentially reducing costs and increasing availability. However, potential negative impacts could include increased scrutiny from advocacy groups concerned about the proliferation of synthetic versions of these substances.

In sum, while the document outlines important procedural aspects of regulatory compliance, it leaves several gaps that could hinder a fuller understanding for stakeholders and the public. Addressing these gaps could lead to better clarity and engagement in the regulatory process.

Issues

  • • The document refers to substances by their drug codes (7360 for Marihuana and 7370 for Tetrahydrocannabinol) without listing their corresponding legal definitions or implications, which might not be clear to all readers.

  • • The document doesn't specify what 'synthetics' means in the context of the application, which could lead to confusion.

  • • There is no information provided about the scale of manufacturing or potential economic impact, which could be relevant for stakeholders.

  • • The document does not provide any assessment or rationale for why Organix, Inc. is deemed appropriate or qualified to be a bulk manufacturer, which might be useful for evaluative purposes.

  • • The method for submitting comments or objections is outlined, but there is no guidance on what constitutes a valid objection or comment, which may lead to ambiguity for respondents.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 290
Sentences: 11
Entities: 27

Language

Nouns: 92
Verbs: 26
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.53
Average Sentence Length:
26.36
Token Entropy:
4.63
Readability (ARI):
16.26

Reading Time

about a minute or two