FR 2021-00333

The document in question is a notice from the Rural Housing Service (RHS), a part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It indicates the agency's intention to revise an existing information collection practice to comply with civil rights laws. The collection of information is aimed at ensuring that recipients of Federal financial assistance from the RHS, and related agencies, are serving beneficiaries without discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. The collected data are crucial for internal monitoring and reporting to Congress and other federal bodies.

General Summary

The notice is issued in line with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, emphasizing compliance with civil rights regulations. The information collection under OMB Number 0575-0018 is a requirement for assessing whether RHS's programs are being delivered equitably. The agencies involved – the Rural Housing Service, Rural Business Service, and Rural Utilities Service – seek public comments by March 15, 2021, to refine their data collection processes.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable issue with the document is the absence of specific details on the financial implications of the information collection. Understanding the cost is essential for evaluating whether the efforts are efficient and justified. Furthermore, the language used, especially within the "Abstract" section, is complex and could benefit from simplification to make it more accessible to a broader audience.

Another concern is the lack of examples illustrating how the collected data support compliance with civil rights laws. Providing tangible examples could clarify the necessity of the information collection and its direct benefits. Additionally, the document does not clearly justify the estimated time burden of 7.5 hours per response, nor does it propose measures to minimize this burden.

The method and specific changes intended for the revision of the information collected remain unspecified, creating ambiguity about the extent and nature of these revisions. The absence of such details leaves stakeholders uncertain about potential changes that could affect them.

Impact on the Public

The collection and utilization of data to ensure compliance with civil rights laws can substantially benefit the general public by promoting equitable access to aid and services. Ensuring nondiscrimination aligns the services with societal values of equality and fairness, fostering trust in public institutions.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders like recipients of Federal financial assistance from these agencies, the burden of providing the required information is significant. Each response is estimated to take considerable time, which might divert resources from other activities. On a positive note, thorough monitoring can protect agencies and recipients from potential lawsuits under discrimination claims, ensuring fair distribution of benefits.

In conclusion, while the intent of the document is clear, providing more detailed information and simplifying the language could improve its effectiveness and accessibility. The opportunity for public commentary offers a chance to address these concerns and fine-tune the processes.