FR 2021-00298

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; U.S. Pacific Highly Migratory Hook and Line Logbook

Agencies

ELI5 AI

NOAA wants to know what people think about a rule where fishers must write down what they catch so that they can study and talk with other countries about fish. They have 60 days to say what they think, but some people might be worried about how hard it is to share this information or what will happen to it.

Summary AI

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is seeking public comments on its information collection activities related to the U.S. Pacific Highly Migratory Hook and Line Logbook. These activities require U.S. fishermen who hold a permit to complete and submit logbooks documenting their fishing activities. The public has 60 days to provide input on this collection process, which aims to assess and minimize the reporting burden on respondents. The information gathered will support fisheries management and negotiations with foreign nations on highly migratory species.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1943
Document #: 2021-00298
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1943-1943

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The document is a notice from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), part of the Department of Commerce, inviting public comments on the collection of information regarding the U.S. Pacific Highly Migratory Hook and Line Logbook. This information collection involves U.S. fishermen who are required to document their fishing activities in logbooks. The purpose of the notice is to gather public input over a 60-day period to assess the impact of these reporting requirements and to ensure minimal burden on those who need to comply. Additionally, the collected data is intended to assist agencies in managing fisheries and engaging in international negotiations concerning highly migratory species.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document has several areas that may raise concerns. Firstly, it does not provide detailed insights into how the estimated public cost of $1,110 was calculated. This lack of transparency might make stakeholders question the accuracy of such estimates. Furthermore, it assumes that all affected fishermen have access to electronic submission methods, which might not be feasible for individuals operating in remote locations or lacking digital literacy.

There is also a potentially intimidating tone in the section requesting comments, where it mentions that personal information included in comments might be made publicly available. This could discourage some stakeholders from participating openly.

In addition, while the document mentions the utility of the information for researchers and managers, it lacks explicit details on how the data will be used beyond these applications. This might lead to public concerns regarding data privacy and the practical utility of collecting such information.

General Public Impact

For the general public, especially those not directly involved in fishing activities, this notice may seem distant. However, it has broader implications for how fisheries are managed and how resources are allocated for monitoring fishing activities. Through public commentary, there’s an opportunity for individuals to influence the efficiency and scope of these reporting requirements.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Fishermen and businesses involved in the highly migratory species fisheries will be directly affected by these information collection requirements. While the logbooks provide essential data for preserving fish stocks and ensuring sustainable fishing practices, the burden of accurately maintaining these records could impose additional operational costs and challenges.

For policymakers and researchers, this document represents an effort to collate critical data that can inform strategies and negotiations. However, it is equally important that sufficient attention is given to balancing data needs with the practical realities faced by fishermen.

In summary, while the intention of this information collection is clear and beneficial for the sustainable management of fisheries, the document could improve in areas of transparency, accessibility, and public engagement to ensure comprehensive compliance and participation.

Financial Assessment

The document from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) mentions an estimated total annual cost to the public of $1,110 related to recordkeeping and reporting for the U.S. Pacific Highly Migratory Hook and Line Logbook. This cost is associated with the administrative burden placed on businesses and other for-profit entities that are required to complete and submit these logbooks as part of their fishing activities documentation.

Financial References and Context

The estimated cost of $1,110 is intended to cover the expenses incurred by businesses in fulfilling the logbook requirements mandated by federal regulations. This cost reflects the time and resources needed to complete, manage, and submit the necessary forms, either electronically or via paper submission, as part of the compliance under the Magnuson-Stevens Act.

Relation to Identified Issues

One of the key issues identified in the document is the lack of transparency regarding how this financial estimate was calculated. The document does not provide detailed information or a breakdown of this amount, which could lead to questions or concerns about its accuracy and whether it adequately reflects the actual burden on the businesses involved. Stakeholders may be unsure if the estimate includes all related costs, such as labor for data entry, materials for printing and mailing, or potential technology investments needed for electronic submissions.

Additionally, the assumed capability of all respondents to use electronic methods for data submission may not be realistic, especially for those operating in remote areas. The lack of clarity on whether this estimate has considered such variances can influence stakeholder trust and compliance willingness.

Potential Impact on Stakeholder Feedback

While the document encourages public comment to refine the information collection processes, the statement about personal identifying information possibly being publicly accessible could deter some stakeholders from participating fully, potentially limiting valuable insights into the actual financial and operational impacts of this requirement. Transparency in financial estimates and clear communication about privacy measures could encourage more open and informative feedback, helping to ensure that the estimated $1,110 accurately reflects the community's experience.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on how the estimated costs to the public ($1,110) were calculated, which may lead to concerns about transparency and accuracy.

  • • The document assumes all affected parties have the capability to submit data electronically, which may not be true for all participants, especially those in remote areas.

  • • The language under the 'Request for Comments' section could be perceived as intimidating due to the statement about personal identifying information potentially being made publicly available, which may deter stakeholders from providing feedback.

  • • No specific mention of how collected data will be utilized beyond providing information to researchers and managers, which may lead to concerns about the data's practical utility and privacy.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 942
Sentences: 37
Entities: 59

Language

Nouns: 354
Verbs: 79
Adjectives: 43
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.04
Average Sentence Length:
25.46
Token Entropy:
5.33
Readability (ARI):
18.45

Reading Time

about 3 minutes