FR 2021-00282

Overview

Title

Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The CDC is having a secret meeting, and a person named Gregory Anderson can tell you more about it. Another person, Kalwant Smagh, is the boss who is allowed to send papers about these meetings.

Summary AI

The document is a notice of a closed meeting by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It references Gregory Anderson as the contact person for further information, listing his contact details. The notice indicates that Kalwant Smagh, the Director of the Strategic Business Initiatives Unit at the CDC, is authorized to sign Federal Register notices related to meetings and committee activities for the CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The document also provides details for referencing, including a filing date and a billing code.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1976
Document #: 2021-00282
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1976-1977

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about a closed meeting, officially filed and published in the Federal Register with the document number 2021-00282 on January 11, 2021. This notice is essential for maintaining official records and providing a formal announcement of administrative activities by government agencies. However, this document does not contain an abstract, which could hinder quick comprehension of its purpose and content.

General Summary

The notice serves to inform the public that the CDC is conducting a closed meeting, though it lacks details about the meeting's purpose, participants, or agenda. Gregory Anderson is listed as the contact person for further information, with his email included in a non-standard format for formal documents. Kalwant Smagh, Director of the Strategic Business Initiatives Unit at the CDC, has been given the authority to sign such notices, which is a routine administrative delegation.

Significant Issues or Concerns

  1. Lack of Transparency: The absence of details about the closed meeting raises concerns regarding transparency. Without information on the meeting's agenda or objectives, the public remains uninformed about the discussions and any potential decisions that may arise from it.

  2. Metadata Incompleteness: The metadata provided lacks an abstract, complicating the process of understanding the notice's context at a glance. Including a brief summary could align with best practices for clarity and accessibility.

  3. Contact Information Formatting: The email address for Gregory Anderson is formatted using Markdown. While this may not adhere to typical formal documentation standards, it is a minor issue compared to the lack of substantive meeting information.

  4. Complex Language: The phrasing used to describe the administrative delegation is formal and could benefit from simplification. This adjustment would make it more accessible to individuals without specialized legal or governmental knowledge.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this notice may seem trivial due to its lack of detailed information. Understanding how government decisions or discussions might affect them becomes difficult without knowing the specifics of the meeting. This could lead to a sense of detachment or concern over governmental transparency and accountability.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Health Professionals and Researchers: Those within the health sector may feel the impact of the closed meeting more acutely if it involves significant health policies or initiatives. The lack of transparency could lead to concern over the direction of future projects and collaborations with the CDC.

  • Policymakers and Administrators: For individuals involved in policy-making and public administration, the document's standard practice of delegating notice-signing authority might be routine. However, without further information, they could lack insight into the meeting's relevance to their work or initiatives.

In conclusion, while the notice meets basic administrative requirements, improvements in transparency, clarity, and accessibility could greatly enhance public understanding and trust. It is pivotal for agencies to balance operational confidentiality with the public's right to information, especially when decisions affecting public health may be involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details concerning the nature of the closed meeting, such as its purpose, attendees, or agenda, which could lead to concerns about transparency.

  • • The notice lacks an abstract or summary in the metadata, making it difficult to understand the document's context quickly.

  • • Contact details for Gregory Anderson include an email address formatted using markdown, which may not be standard for formal documentation.

  • • The language used to describe the authority delegation ("has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices...") is somewhat formal and could be simplified for clarity.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 165
Sentences: 4
Entities: 25

Language

Nouns: 70
Verbs: 4
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 15

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.27
Average Sentence Length:
41.25
Token Entropy:
4.19
Readability (ARI):
27.00

Reading Time

less than a minute