Overview
Title
Notice of Solicitation of Applications (NOSA) for the Strategic Economic and Community Development Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The USDA has some money to help projects in small towns that can cover more than one area and different types of work, but it's a little tricky to figure out exactly who can apply and how to fill out the forms.
Summary AI
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has re-authorized the Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD) priority through the 2018 Farm Bill. For FY 2021, the agency is reserving funds from certain development programs to prioritize projects that support multi-jurisdictional and multi-sectoral strategic community investment plans. Applicants for these funds need to submit specific forms and meet eligibility requirements, with an emphasis on projects in rural areas. The notice also encourages projects that improve life in rural America, including areas designated as Opportunity Zones and efforts to combat substance use disorders.
Abstract
The Agriculture Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill) re-authorized the Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD) priority with some modifications. Section 6401 of the 2018 Farm Bill enables the Secretary of Agriculture to prioritize projects that support multi-jurisdictional and multi-sectoral strategic community investment plans, recently included in the existing regulation In Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, the Agency implements SECD through reserving funds from covered program's appropriations. The purpose of this notice is to provide requirements to applicants submitting applications for the covered programs' reserved funds and to establish the above mentioned priority.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document provides detailed guidance regarding the Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD) program as authorized under the 2018 Farm Bill. Specifically, it explains the process for applying for FY 2021 funds reserved for projects that align with strategic community investment plans across multiple jurisdictions and sectors. This initiative aims to improve rural life by focusing on connectivity, economic development, technological innovation, workforce support, and quality of life improvements. Additionally, it places special emphasis on projects located in Opportunity Zones and initiatives combating substance use disorders.
Summary of the Document
The notice from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) outlines the application requirements, eligibility criteria, and priority considerations for entities seeking funding under the updated SECD guidelines. The intended beneficiaries of this scheme include projects that exhibit strategic planning and have the potential to offer significant improvements in rural areas. Specific projects within community facilities, water and waste disposal, and business development are prioritized under the rules set in SECD regulation 7 CFR part 1980, subpart K.
Significant Issues and Concerns
The notice contains several complex requirements that could pose challenges for applicants, especially those unfamiliar with federal grant processes. The language used in describing eligibility and the application process could be intricate and potentially lead to misunderstandings. Additionally, the variability in defining "rural areas" across different programs could further confuse applicants trying to determine their eligibility. Moreover, the lack of specificity regarding the exact funding amounts available might hinder applicants' ability to plan adequately.
The document stresses the necessity of understanding specific regulations (such as SECD regulation 7 CFR part 1980), which may not be readily accessible to all potential applicants. This could create a barrier to entry for smaller organizations or those lacking resources needed to navigate complicated federal funding protocols.
Impact on the Public
The broader public might find the notice advantageous, primarily if it leads to visible improvements in rural living conditions through successful project implementations. Projects facilitated under the SECD might contribute to economic growth, improved infrastructure, and enhanced resilience of rural communities.
However, if potential applicants face hurdles due to the complexity of the application process or misunderstanding of eligibility requirements, there might be fewer viable projects realized, diluting the intended positive impact.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders such as nonprofit organizations, local governments, and businesses involved in rural development, this document represents an opportunity to access federal resources to further their community goals. Successful applicants might benefit significantly through ability to implement impactful projects. Entities located in Opportunity Zones, in particular, may find themselves at an advantage due to potential tax incentives tied to these projects.
Nevertheless, stakeholders less experienced with federal procedures or without ready access to resources and expertise necessary to navigate this process might find themselves at a disadvantage. They could potentially require additional support or education to compete effectively for the available funds.
In conclusion, while the notice aims to spur much-needed development in rural areas, success hinges on accessibility and clear communication of application procedures and eligibility criteria. It’s crucial for stakeholders to approach the application process with a thorough understanding of the requirements and seek guidance where necessary to enhance their chances of success.
Issues
• The language regarding eligibility requirements is detailed and complex, which could be difficult for some applicants to fully understand without additional clarification.
• The requirement to submit Form RD 1980-88 and supporting documentation might be cumbersome for applicants not acquainted with the specific requirements of each covered program.
• The criteria for what constitutes a 'rural area' is not standardized across programs, potentially causing confusion among applicants regarding eligibility.
• Details about the exact amount of funds available are unclear, as it is stated that the funds depend on what's available in the covered programs, which might cause uncertainty in planning for applicants.
• The deadline and process for submitting applications differ depending on the covered program, which might lead to complications or mistakes by applicants.
• The reference to the use of 'SECD regulation 7 CFR part 1980, subpart K' assumes familiarity with the regulation, which could be a barrier for less experienced applicants.
• While there are encouragements for particular types of projects, there is a lack of clear prioritized points system which might make it difficult for applicants to understand the strategic focus of fund allocation.