FR 2021-00160

Overview

Title

New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The New England Fishery Management Council is having a big online meeting to talk about fish in the ocean and how to take care of them. People can join the meeting and even tell them what they think, just like when you share your ideas in class!

Summary AI

The New England Fishery Management Council is holding a three-day public meeting from January 26 to January 28, 2021, conducted entirely online due to COVID-19 restrictions. The meeting will discuss various issues affecting New England fisheries, including the Groundfish Committee's actions, updates on scallop fishing licenses, and small-mesh multispecies specifications. Attendees can register to join the webinar online, and the meeting will include opportunities for public comments on issues not listed in the agenda.

Abstract

The New England Fishery Management Council (Council, NEFMC) will hold a three-day meeting to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Due to federal and state travel restrictions and updated guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention related to COVID-19, this meeting will be conducted entirely by webinar.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1481
Document #: 2021-00160
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1481-1483

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register outlines a public meeting organized by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC), scheduled to be conducted entirely online over three days, from January 26 to January 28, 2021. This meeting aims to address various issues and decisions concerning fisheries in New England's exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The shift to an online format is due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and health guidelines.

General Summary

The NEFMC will begin its session with a meeting of the Groundfish Committee. Following that, the meeting will expand to include the full Council. Crucial topics on the agenda include proposals related to fishing regulations and licenses, particularly concerning redfish and small-mesh species like whiting. There will also be discussions on scallop fishing licenses and strategies.

Interested parties can participate by registering for the webinar. The meeting agenda includes presentations from various experts and provides a platform for public engagement, although inputs will be limited to specific periods within the event schedule.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document that could impact both the public and specific stakeholders.

One area of concern is the lack of detailed financial implications for the proposed actions. Without this information, there is the potential for unidentified spending or budget challenges, affecting both public funding and the economic welfare of those in the fishing industry.

Additionally, the notice provides insufficient detail about the criteria for the limited entry program for party/charter vessels. This could create confusion or hinder the effective implementation of regulations designed to manage fishery resources.

The document also uses numerous technical terms and acronyms without definitions. This might make comprehension difficult for individuals not specially versed in fishery management terminology, potentially limiting effective public participation.

Public Impact

Broadly, this document reflects an administrative effort to manage and sustain fishery resources effectively, maintaining ecological balance while supporting livelihoods dependent on the fishing industry. The public, including those not directly involved in the fisheries, stands to benefit from better managed and conserved fishery resources, which contribute to broader environmental health and local economies.

Stakeholder Impact

Specific stakeholders, such as commercial fishers, recreational anglers, and associated businesses, may experience direct impacts from the meeting's outcomes. Positive impacts could include clearer regulations and potential opportunities opened by the decisions made, which can ensure sustainable fishing practices. However, there might also be negative effects, such as stricter regulations that could limit fishing activities or reduce opportunities, particularly if stakeholders find difficulty in adapting to newly implemented policies due to a lack of clarity or needed resources.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the document facilitates a structured meeting to discuss crucial fishery management issues, it sidelined some critical details that could empower stakeholders and the public to engage more meaningfully. Increased transparency regarding financial implications, clearer communication of proposals, and understandable terms would further public understanding and industry cooperation in pursuit of ecological and economic sustainability in New England's fisheries.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on the budget or financial implications of the proposed actions, leaving potential for undisclosed spending concerns.

  • • The notice lacks clarity on the specific criteria for the limited entry program for party/charter vessels, potentially leading to ambiguity in implementation.

  • • Certain technical terms and acronyms (e.g., FMP, NEFSC) are used without definitions, which could make the document difficult for non-experts to understand.

  • • The process for public participation and comment is mentioned, but further clarification on how feedback will be incorporated into decision-making could improve transparency.

  • • The document does not specify which emergency issues could arise or why they might necessitate deviation from the agenda, potentially leading to unforeseen spending or actions without adequate public notice.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 1,657
Sentences: 49
Entities: 177

Language

Nouns: 605
Verbs: 136
Adjectives: 76
Adverbs: 26
Numbers: 77

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.86
Average Sentence Length:
33.82
Token Entropy:
5.49
Readability (ARI):
22.02

Reading Time

about 6 minutes