FR 2021-00159

Overview

Title

Fisheries of the South Atlantic; Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The people who take care of fish in the ocean are having an online meeting to talk about the number of a special kind of fish called Tilefish in the South Atlantic. They want to make sure there are plenty of these fish in the sea, and anyone can join the meeting to listen and make suggestions.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced plans for the SEDAR 66 Assessment Webinar II, focused on evaluating the South Atlantic Tilefish stock. The webinar is scheduled for January 27, 2021, and it is part of a multi-step process called SEDAR, which involves data analysis, assessment, and review to determine the status of fish stocks. Participants include representatives from fishery management councils, NOAA Fisheries, and other involved organizations. The meeting will discuss finalizing data and proposed changes to the stock assessment model, and it is open to the public.

Abstract

The SEDAR 66 stock assessment of the South Atlantic stock of Tilefish will consist of a data scoping webinar, a workshop, and a series of assessment webinars. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1480
Document #: 2021-00159
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1480-1481

AnalysisAI

The recent notice from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) details an upcoming assessment webinar focused on the Tilefish population in the South Atlantic. This initiative is part of a larger, structured process known as the Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR), which evaluates fish stock situations through a series of organized discussions. The SEDAR 66 Assessment Webinar II is scheduled for January 27, 2021, and will engage representatives from fishery councils, NOAA Fisheries, and other groups interested in marine resource management.

General Summary

The document discusses the logistical and organizational aspects of the SEDAR 66 Assessment Webinar II. The webinar aims to refine data discussions, solidify the base model configuration, and explore potential changes to the stock assessment model for the South Atlantic Tilefish. This webinar is part of a broader assessment approach which includes data collection, evaluation, and a final review step. The program is open to public attendance, fostering transparency and community involvement.

Significant Issues or Concerns

While the document is thorough in its description of the process, it does present some issues:

  • Complexity and Clarity: The text uses technical language that could be challenging for the general public to fully grasp without a background in fisheries management. For example, terms such as "base model configuration" may not be immediately clear to laypersons.

  • Vague Agenda: The meeting agenda is broad and lacks specific detail, making it difficult for stakeholders to prepare effectively. The use of phrases like "if needed" adds ambiguity about what precisely will be discussed or decided.

  • Transparency: Although several stakeholders are mentioned, the text does not outline specific budgetary allocations or potential beneficiaries, which are important for fostering trust and transparency in public processes.

Impact on the Public

Overall, these webinars and the broader SEDAR process play a crucial role in maintaining sustainable fishing practices, impacting anyone who relies on the fishing industry for livelihood or recreation. A successful assessment can lead to policies that ensure tilefish populations are protected, thus sustaining fishing as an economic resource and a food source.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • Fishermen and Industry: By participating in these assessments, industry stakeholders can provide input that might help prevent overly restrictive fishing regulations by ensuring they are based on comprehensive and accurate data.

  • Environmental Groups: These entities benefit from a science-based approach to ensure the longevity and health of marine ecosystems.

Negative Impacts:

  • Complex Processes: Stakeholders without scientific expertise may find it challenging to engage fully, possibly feeling excluded from meaningful participation.

  • Potential for Miscommunication: Given the technical nature of the advisory and lack of detailed agenda points, there could be misunderstandings or missed opportunities for input from diverse interest groups.

By facilitating open discussions and data analysis, the SEDAR process aims for informed decision-making in fishery management. However, enhancing clarity and detail in public documents could further bolster stakeholder trust and engagement.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific budgetary details, making it difficult to assess for potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no mention of specific organizations or individuals that might receive preferential treatment, which might be relevant for transparency.

  • • The language used to describe the SEDAR process and its steps might be considered complex, particularly the description of the workshops and their outcomes.

  • • The meeting's agenda is somewhat vague, especially in terms of the discussion topics ('Finalize any data discussions if needed', 'Continue discussion on base model configuration', 'Discuss proposed changes to model'), which could benefit from more specificity.

  • • The text contains phrases like 'non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before this group' which could lead to ambiguity about what may be discussed or acted upon during the meeting.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 836
Sentences: 32
Entities: 64

Language

Nouns: 335
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 37

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.33
Average Sentence Length:
26.12
Token Entropy:
5.22
Readability (ARI):
20.25

Reading Time

about 3 minutes