FR 2021-00145

Overview

Title

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is asking for people's thoughts on a rule that makes sure the info investment ads show is honest and easy to compare, like making sure everyone uses the same size crayons to make a coloring book. They're also wondering if everything is working well and if it can be improved.

Summary AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seeking public comments regarding the extension of information collection under Rule 34b-1, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This rule pertains to the sales literature of investment companies, ensuring that performance data is standardized and not misleading to investors. The SEC estimates that each year, approximately 351 respondents submit 7,362 responses related to this rule, with a total annual burden of around 46,278 hours. The SEC invites comments on whether this information collection is necessary and how the process might be improved.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1551
Document #: 2021-00145
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1551-1551

AnalysisAI

The document in question pertains to a notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeking public comments on the extension of information collection under Rule 34b-1. This is part of the SEC's obligations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Rule 34b-1 deals with sales literature from investment companies, ensuring the performance data presented is standardized and not misleading, thus facilitating informed decision-making by investors. The SEC estimates a significant annual effort, with respondents dedicating a combined 46,278 hours to comply with this rule.

Summary and General Understanding

In essence, the document outlines the SEC's efforts to gather public input on extending the requirements for investment companies to include specific, standardized performance data in their sales literature. This rule is designed to ensure transparency and comparability in the information provided to investors, which is crucial for making informed investment decisions. The SEC posits that this results in an extensive yearly burden on the parties involved, emphasizing the need for clear and accurate information.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise upon reviewing the document:

  1. Lack of Cost Transparency: The document fails to provide a clear outline of the financial costs associated with compliance. While it addresses hours spent, it does not estimate the monetary expenses borne by companies adhering to these regulations, which can be significant.

  2. Complex References: The document makes numerous references to legal statutes and regulations (e.g., 44 U.S.C. 3501, 17 CFR 270.34b-1) that may not be easily understood by a general audience. A brief explanation or summary of these references would make the document more accessible.

  3. Technical Jargon: Terms like "uniformly computed data" and "legend disclosure" are used without explanation. This might hinder understanding for those unfamiliar with the specific lexicon of financial regulation, potentially alienating some stakeholders.

  4. Potential Biases in Data Collection: While the document calls for feedback on minimizing the burden of information collection, it does not address concerns about biases that might arise if automated collection techniques or information technology were implemented.

  5. Outdated Data: The burden estimates and statistics referenced within the document rely on data from 2019, which may not accurately reflect the current situation. This could mislead stakeholders trying to understand contemporary challenges.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, particularly investors, this rule aims to ensure they receive accurate and comparable performance data from investment funds. This theoretically aids them in making better-informed investment decisions. However, failure to communicate the complexities and costs involved might lead to misunderstandings about regulatory efficiency and effectiveness.

Specific Stakeholder Impact

Investment Companies: These stakeholders might view the mandatory requirements as a substantial compliance burden, both in terms of time and potentially unquantified financial resources. Additional public commentary could provide these companies with an opportunity to express these concerns and suggest potential improvements.

Regulatory Bodies: For entities like the SEC, collecting this feedback is vital in balancing the regulatory objectives with minimizing undue burdens on companies. The commentary period allows them to refine processes and address stakeholder concerns proactively.

Advocacy Groups: Organizations focused on transparency and investor protection might use this opportunity to advocate for even stricter rules ensuring that investment companies present performance data clearly and comparably.

Ultimately, while the rule serves a vital function in safeguarding investor interests, the document highlights areas where communication and data accuracy could be improved to ensure all stakeholders are well-informed and fairly treated.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the total cost associated with the collection of information noted, such as any monetary expenses borne by respondents, which could lead to misunderstandings about potential wasteful spending.

  • • The use of references to regulations and acts (e.g., 44 U.S.C. 3501, 17 CFR 270.34b-1) without providing a brief explanation or summary could be unclear to those not familiar with them.

  • • The document includes technical terms like 'uniformly computed data' and 'legend disclosure' which may not be easily understood by all readers, potentially limiting the document's accessibility.

  • • There is no discussion about whether automated collection techniques or information technology might introduce biases or systematic errors, which could benefit specific organizations or individuals.

  • • The footnotes reference statistics from 2019, which may not accurately reflect current realities and could mislead those using the document to understand contemporary burdens.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 643
Sentences: 24
Entities: 64

Language

Nouns: 206
Verbs: 58
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.02
Average Sentence Length:
26.79
Token Entropy:
5.05
Readability (ARI):
19.27

Reading Time

about 2 minutes