FR 2021-00107

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Education wants to know if making an FSA ID, which helps students get into certain websites for school money, is too hard or takes too long, and they are asking people to tell them how it can be better or easier by February 8, 2021.

Summary AI

The Department of Education is seeking public comments on revising a currently approved information collection related to the Federal Student Aid's Personal Authentication Service (PAS). This service involves creating an FSA ID, which is a unique username and password that allows individuals to access various FSA systems like FAFSA and StudentLoans.gov. The Department is interested in feedback on whether the collection is necessary, how the burden can be minimized, and how to improve the quality and clarity of the information collected. Comments are open until February 8, 2021, and the agency values public opinion to enhance its processes and reduce any potential inconvenience to respondents.

Abstract

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is proposing a revision of a currently approved collection.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1485
Document #: 2021-00107
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1485-1486

AnalysisAI

The Department of Education is seeking comments from the public on a plan to revise an existing collection of information related to the Federal Student Aid's Personal Authentication Service (PAS). The PAS involves creating a Federal Student Aid (FSA) ID, which is essentially a unique username and password. This ID enables users to access various FSA systems, such as FAFSA and StudentLoans.gov. Through this call for public input, the Department aims to improve its processes and reduce the burden on individuals filling out these forms.

Summary of the Document

This notice from the Department of Education, specifically the Federal Student Aid division, is part of their effort to adhere to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Department is seeking to understand whether the current methods of information collection are effective and necessary. They have outlined the opportunity for public commentary, which is open until February 8, 2021.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several potential issues arise from the document. The estimated burden of 6,671,000 annual responses and 1,667,750 burden hours suggests a significant workload both for the Department and for individuals responding to this collection. This volume may concern stakeholders about the efficiency and justifiability of the process.

Moreover, while the document requests feedback on the necessity and burden of this collection, it does not provide a detailed explanation of how the collected information will be used or processed efficiently. This lack of transparency may lead to apprehension regarding the effectiveness of these efforts.

The Department raises questions about the accuracy of its burden estimates and how it might improve data collection, implying that their current estimates may not be fully reliable or efficient. Furthermore, the description of the PAS system is somewhat vague and might confuse individuals unfamiliar with its specific functionalities and importance.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The broad impact on the public involves both opportunity and responsibility. On one hand, individuals can participate in refining and possibly reducing the bureaucratic hurdles associated with student aid processes by providing feedback. On the other hand, the complexity of the system and the burden it poses could deter individuals from engaging with these systems. This could affect those relying on financial aid to pursue higher education, potentially complicating their application experience.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For specific stakeholders, such as students and families applying for federal aid, the requirement to navigate a potentially cumbersome system could be daunting. The FSA ID is a crucial portal for accessing essential aid resources, but if its creation is too complex or the instructions remain unclear, it may pose significant challenges.

Educational institutions and organizations that support students in this process could also be affected. They might need to allocate additional resources to guide students through revised collection processes or address concerns about efficiency and reliability raised by the proposed revisions.

Conclusion

This document presents both an opportunity for improvement and ongoing challenges for the stakeholders involved. The Department of Education's efforts to solicit public input highlight a willingness to address issues and improve the system. However, ensuring clarity, transparency, and minimizing the burden on respondents will be crucial to achieving a balanced and effective outcome. It is essential for the Department to clearly communicate the purpose and benefits of the PAS system while simplifying the comment submission process to encourage broader public participation.

Issues

  • • The document mentions a significant burden in terms of annual responses (6,671,000) and annual burden hours (1,667,750), which might raise concerns about the efficiency of the collection process and potential for waste if not adequately justified.

  • • There is no clear explanation of how the information collected will be used or processed in a timely manner, which could lead to concerns about effectiveness and efficiency.

  • • The document requests public comments addressing the accuracy of the burden estimate and suggests potential ways to minimize it, indicating that the initial burden estimate might not be fully reliable.

  • • The description of the Personal Authentication Service (PAS) and its necessity is somewhat vague, which might lead to misunderstandings regarding its importance and functionality.

  • • The communication of instructions for submitting comments is split between text and complex navigational instructions for an external website, which could be confusing for some readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 688
Sentences: 29
Entities: 60

Language

Nouns: 228
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 22
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 30

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.12
Average Sentence Length:
23.72
Token Entropy:
5.10
Readability (ARI):
17.91

Reading Time

about 2 minutes