FR 2021-00005

Overview

Title

OneRD Annual Notice of Guarantee Fee Rates, Periodic Retention Fee Rates, Loan Guarantee Percentage and Fee for Issuance of the Loan Note Guarantee Prior to Construction Completion for Fiscal Year 2021; correction

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government realized they forgot to include special rules for Alaska and some fee details in their loan guide, so they fixed it to make sure everyone knows the right information.

Summary AI

The Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Rural Housing Service, and Rural Utilities Service in the Department of Agriculture announced a correction to a previous document about loan guarantee rates and fees for fiscal year 2021. The correction added missing details specific to Alaska and clarified when certain fee payments begin. The original notice was issued on September 1, 2020, and the correction updates it to include all necessary information.

Abstract

The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBCS), Rural Housing Service (RHS), and the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), agencies of the Rural Development mission area within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), published a document on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, announcing the Guarantee Fee rates, Guarantee percent for Guaranteed Loans, the Periodic Retention Fee, and Fee for Issuance of the Loan Note Guarantee Prior to Construction Completion for FY 2021, to be used when applying for guarantee loans under the aforementioned guarantee loan types. The document was missing a guarantee percentage specific to the State of Alaska and information regarding collection of the periodic guarantee retention fee.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 1087
Document #: 2021-00005
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1087-1088

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register recently published a correction to an earlier notice regarding loan guarantee rates and fees applicable for the fiscal year 2021, issued by the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, the Rural Housing Service, and the Rural Utilities Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This correction addresses the omission of key details in the original document concerning specific financial rates and procedures, particularly for the state of Alaska and regarding periodic fee collection.

General Summary

The original notice, issued on September 1, 2020, outlined the Guarantee Fee rates, Guarantee percentage, and other financial details essential for those applying for loans under USDA's various loan guarantee programs. However, the document was published without including the specific guarantee percentage for Alaska and lacked comprehensive information about the periodic guarantee retention fee. The correction seeks to fill these gaps by introducing necessary additions and clarifications.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Although the correction attempts to remedy previous omissions, it leaves several significant issues unaddressed. Notably, it fails to provide clarity on how the guarantee percentage for Alaska will be established or calculated. Moreover, the correction does not give detailed insight into how the periodic guarantee retention fee will be collected or calculated, creating potential confusion for borrowers and lenders.

Further, the document's brief explanation of fee payment schedules uses language that might confuse stakeholders unfamiliar with the detailed procedural timeline, stating that the first fee payment is due on January 31 of the second year following a certain range of issuance dates. Such phrasing lacks practical guidance on calculating these timelines.

A fundamental drawback is the absence of a reason for the initial oversight concerning Alaska and the retention fee. Furthermore, there is no specific guidance on who to contact for inquiries, particularly about Alaska’s guarantee percentage. These omissions may perplex potential borrowers and stakeholders who seek clarity.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, especially those considering participating in USDA's loan programs, these vague and incomplete notices could pose significant barriers. Clarity and complete guidance are essential in ensuring stakeholders fully understand the expense and obligations involved in these loan guarantees.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Potential borrowers in Alaska may face uncertainty, as the document does not clarify how they can determine the guarantee percentage applicable to their loans. This could affect financing decisions or applications under the USDA programs. Additionally, lenders and financial professionals must navigate these unaddressed gaps, potentially causing delays or miscalculations in loan setups.

On a positive note, addressing the issue through this correction might encourage a reevaluation of communication and documentation standards, prompting government agencies to ensure greater transparency and completeness in future notices.

In summary, while the notice aims to correct previous omissions, its lack of clarity and comprehensive details may impede an effective understanding and execution of the updated terms among stakeholders. It underscores the importance of precise and complete documentation in federal communications, especially when it affects financial commitments and operations.

Issues

  • • The document correction lacks clarity and detail on how the guarantee percentage for the State of Alaska will be determined.

  • • The notice provides insufficient details regarding the collection and calculation method for the periodic guarantee retention fee.

  • • The language in the correction ('For loans where the Loan Note Guarantee is issued between October 1 and December 31, the first periodic retention fee payment is due January 31 of the second year following the date the Loan Note Guarantee was issued.') could be confusing as it does not specify the formula or method used to calculate such dates and fees.

  • • The document does not provide an explanation or justification for the original omission of information regarding Alaska and the retention fee.

  • • There is no clear guideline or contact method for how individuals or organizations can address further inquiries or issues specifically about the guarantee percentage for Alaska.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 395
Sentences: 12
Entities: 46

Language

Nouns: 157
Verbs: 18
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.87
Average Sentence Length:
32.92
Token Entropy:
4.76
Readability (ARI):
21.14

Reading Time

about a minute or two