FR 2020-29320

The document being discussed here pertains to a withdrawal notification issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Initially, an information collection titled "Voluntary Reporting of Planned New Reactor Applications" appeared in the Federal Register on December 29, 2020. However, it was later identified as duplicative because a similar document had already been issued earlier on December 1, 2020. This withdrawal officially takes effect on January 7, 2021.

General Summary

The withdrawal concerns an inadvertent duplication of a notice regarding planned new reactor applications. The repeated notice was made void to streamline communication and avoid confusion, as the original notice issued on December 1, 2020, is still active, with its comment period extending until February 1, 2021. The NRC provides multiple avenues for the public to obtain information regarding this action, underscoring its openness to public participation and transparency.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues here is the administrative oversight that led to the duplication of the notice. While this may seem minor, such errors could signal inefficiencies within the agency's document management or review processes. Proper coordination and oversight are crucial in maintaining the credibility and reliability of official communications, especially when they pertain to important matters like nuclear regulation.

Furthermore, while the document mentions accessible online resources for those seeking further information, it also notes that the Public Document Room is currently closed. This closure, presumably due to the ongoing pandemic or other constraints, may still pose a barrier for individuals who rely on in-person document examination, highlighting the need for robust digital access and alternative communication methods.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the public’s direct impact from this withdrawal may be limited, as the primary document from December 1 stands unaffected. Nevertheless, the retraction underscores the importance of clarity and efficiency in regulatory communications, factors crucial for maintaining public trust in regulatory processes.

For stakeholders more closely tied to the nuclear industry, such as companies planning to submit new reactor applications, any confusion or delays caused by document duplications might disrupt their administrative processes. Clear communication is vital to avoid missteps that could arise from relying on erroneous or duplicated notifications.

On a positive note, the NRC's swift response to correct the error exemplifies accountability. It reassures both the public and industry actors that the agency is vigilant and responsive, acting promptly to remedy its mistakes. Such actions may enhance stakeholders' confidence in the agency's commitment to accuracy and transparency.

In conclusion, this incident, while minor in scope, serves as a pertinent reminder of the significance of precise communication in governmental operations. By addressing this duplication promptly, the NRC reinforces its role as a diligent regulatory body, dedicated to maintaining transparency and efficiency in its dealings with various stakeholders.