Overview
Title
Product Change-Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Postal Service wants to add a new contract for sending packages faster, and they told some important people about it. They didn't explain how it will make things better or who will benefit, so it's a bit like adding a new tool to a toolbox without saying how it helps.
Summary AI
The Postal Service has announced that it submitted a request to the Postal Regulatory Commission. This request is to add a new contract for domestic shipping services to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements under the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List. The request was officially filed on December 28, 2020, and related documents are accessible online at www.prc.gov under Docket Nos. MC2021-64, CP2021-66. Sean Robinson, an attorney in Corporate and Postal Business Law, provided further contact information for those who are interested.
Abstract
The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document is a notice from the Postal Service regarding its request to add a new domestic shipping contract to the Competitive Products List. Filed on December 28, 2020, with the Postal Regulatory Commission, this addition pertains to a specific agreement known as Priority Mail Contract 687. The notice specifies that this contract is part of the broader Negotiated Service Agreements within the Mail Classification Schedule, aimed at providing competitive shipping options. The details of this filing are available for public viewing on the Postal Regulatory Commission's website, listed under Docket Nos. MC2021-64 and CP2021-66.
Significant Issues and Concerns
While
Issues
• The document does not provide detailed financial implications of adding the Priority Mail Contract 687 to the Competitive Product List, which could be necessary for evaluating potential wasteful spending.
• The document lacks specific information on which organization or entity will benefit from the domestic shipping services contract, making it unclear if spending favors particular organizations.
• The language used is clear and straightforward; however, the overall impact and benefits of the contract addition are not fully elaborated.
• The document does not provide an explanation of how this addition aligns with broader Postal Service goals or how it will impact customers.