Overview
Title
Ohio; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration
Agencies
ELI5 AI
FEMA changed who is in charge of helping Ohio recover from a disaster and is now working with a new person named Joseph. Some parts of the notice are a bit confusing because they mention special codes and details without explaining them, which might make it hard for people to understand everything.
Summary AI
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has updated a previous disaster declaration for Ohio, originally issued on June 18, 2019. This change took effect on December 28, 2020, and involves appointing Joseph Cirone as the new Federal Coordinating Officer, replacing Steven W. Johnson. FEMA also outlined several programs with specific federal assistance numbers for disaster recovery efforts. These updates are part of FEMA's ongoing response to manage the declared disaster effectively.
Abstract
This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio (FEMA-4447-DR), dated June 18, 2019, and related determinations.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
This document from the Federal Register provides an update to a major disaster declaration in Ohio, originally dated June 18, 2019. On December 28, 2020, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) appointed Joseph Cirone to replace Steven W. Johnson as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. These changes are part of FEMA's continuing efforts to coordinate disaster response in Ohio effectively.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One notable concern regarding this notice is the lack of detail on financial implications and the precise budget related to the amendment. Without this information, the public cannot fully assess whether funds are being used efficiently or if there might be potential for waste or favoritism.
Additionally, the notice includes a list of Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numbers that relate to various disaster assistance programs. However, it fails to provide descriptions or context for these funding categories. This lack of clarity can make it challenging for readers unfamiliar with federal assistance codes to understand what services or support these programs involve.
The document also does not provide an explanation of the criteria used for the appointments and terminations of the Federal Coordinating Officers. A lack of transparency in such personnel changes may raise questions among stakeholders about the decision-making process.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this document affects the public by indicating ongoing federal support and management of disaster recovery in Ohio. The change in administrative leadership, represented by the appointment of a new Federal Coordinating Officer, suggests efforts to ensure effective management of disaster relief and recovery efforts.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders such as residents of the affected areas in Ohio, the updates signify a continued commitment to recovery and assistance programs. However, the lack of clarity regarding funding allocation and program specifics in the notice may cause uncertainty for those directly dependent on this aid.
For government agencies and local authorities, the document's implications include a shift in coordination and possibly in strategies for disaster management, following the change in the Federal Coordinating Officer. This shift has the potential to impact how effectively assistance programs are implemented and accessed at the community level.
Overall, while the document signals ongoing engagement by federal authorities in Ohio's disaster recovery, it highlights the need for clearer communication and transparency in government notices to ensure that affected individuals and communities fully understand and can benefit from the available assistance.
Issues
• The document does not explicitly outline the financial implications or budgetary amounts associated with the amendment, making it difficult to assess potential wastefulness or favoritism in spending.
• The notice refers to specific Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) without explaining what each funding category entails, which may not be clear to all readers.
• There is no explanation of the criteria used for the appointment and termination of the Federal Coordinating Officers, which may raise questions about transparency.
• The document uses specific administrative codes (e.g., 97.030, 97.031) without providing descriptions or context, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with these codes.