FR 2020-29226

General Summary

On December 28, 2020, President Donald J. Trump issued a proclamation marking the 850th anniversary of Saint Thomas Becket's martyrdom. Becket, who was killed in 1170, is honored in the proclamation as a staunch defender of religious freedom. The document highlights Becket's resistance to King Henry II's efforts to subordinate the church to the state, painting him as a historic symbol of the fight against religious oppression. The proclamation urges Americans to commemorate Becket through ceremonies in schools and churches, emphasizing the enduring importance of religious liberty in American society.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable issues within the proclamation. Firstly, the language of the document is highly emotive, with vivid descriptions and historical references. While this may capture the spirit of Becket's stand, it might not conform to the traditionally neutral tone expected in a presidential proclamation. Moreover, the inclusion of references to current political and religious figures could be interpreted as politically sensitive or charged, potentially diverting attention from the historical commemoration intended by the document.

Additionally, the strong religious overtones present in the proclamation could raise concerns about the separation of church and state. While it underscores the importance of religious freedom, the overt religious language might be perceived by some as blurring the line between government and religion.

The document is primarily ceremonial in nature and does not detail any concrete policy actions or changes, which some might find lacking in practical application.

Impact on the Public

The proclamation may have varying impacts on the public. For the general population, it serves as a reminder of the historical roots of religious freedom and its significance in American values. It could foster a renewed awareness of the importance of protecting religious liberties in contemporary society.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For religious communities and advocates of religious freedom, the proclamation is likely a positive affirmation of their efforts and beliefs. It aligns with their values and may encourage further advocacy for religious liberties globally and domestically.

Conversely, for those who are wary of mixing governmental functions with religious themes, this document might be a cause for concern. They may view it as an undue emphasis on religion within official governmental proclamations and a potential threat to secular governance principles.

Overall, while this proclamation highlights an important historical event and underscores the value of religious freedom, the manner of its presentation and broader implications may elicit a mixed reception from different segments of the public.