Overview
Title
Information Collection: NRC Form 446, “Request for Approval of Official Foreign Travel by Non-Government Personnel”
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission wants people who are not in the government but need to travel to other countries for important work to fill out a special form called NRC Form 446 to get permission. They are asking for opinions about this idea by February 5, 2021.
Summary AI
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has proposed collecting information through a form titled NRC Form 446. This form is needed for non-government personnel to request approval for official foreign travel. Comments on this proposal are encouraged and should be submitted by February 5, 2021. The collected information is essential for obtaining approval from the appropriate U.S. Department of State Chief of Mission.
Abstract
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted a proposed collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The information collection is entitled, NRC Form 446, "Request for Approval of Official Foreign Travel by Non-Government Personnel."
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document under consideration outlines a notice from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regarding a proposed information collection initiative. This involves the submission of a new form, NRC Form 446, which is essential for non-government personnel seeking approval for official international travel linked to the NRC's activities. This regulatory step appears crucial for ensuring that all necessary approvals from the U.S. Department of State are in place before such travel is undertaken. Stakeholders and the public were invited to provide comments by February 5, 2021, which emphasizes the importance of public engagement in refining and implementing regulatory processes.
General Summary
The primary goal of NRC Form 446 is to streamline and formalize the process by which non-government personnel can request and gain approval for official foreign travel associated with NRC tasks. The notice highlights fundamental details about the proposed form, including its necessity, the number of responses expected annually (which is notably low at just one response), and the processing requirements. These points imply that the form is designed more for specific, potentially rare situations rather than routine use.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several notable issues arise from this notice. First and foremost, the estimated number of annual responses and respondents set at one each raises questions about the initiative's scope and cost-effectiveness. It is unclear if the form will address a current underestimation of need or if it is overly narrow in its applicability, which might limit its usefulness.
Moreover, the document is repetitive in how it presents the ways to obtain information and submit comments, which might obfuscate rather than clarify the process for stakeholders. Additionally, while the term "non-Government personnel" is used, there is no clear definition or guidance on who precisely falls under this category, nor on the exact circumstances that necessitate the completion of this form.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this document itself might not have an immediate or direct impact, as it appears to cater more towards professionals or entities engaged with the NRC but not directly employed by the government. However, for those involved, including researchers, consultants, or industry experts engaging in international collaborations, understanding and complying with this requirement could become a critical component of their work.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders such as private-sector professionals, academic researchers, or experts in the nuclear regulatory sphere may be directly impacted by this form. It could add a layer of bureaucracy that might delay travel plans. Conversely, it provides a formal pathway to ensure that international engagements align with both NRC regulatory requirements and U.S. foreign policy, safeguarding against unauthorized activities that might contravene national interests.
In conclusion, while this proposed information collection process via NRC Form 446 is designed to enhance compliance and coordination for specific non-governmental entities, clarity in its implementation and the rationale behind its limited scope would be beneficial. Streamlining the document to enhance understanding and engagement from interested parties, alongside a definitive operational framework, would allow stakeholders to better navigate the proposed changes.
Issues
• The document does not specify the potential costs associated with processing NRC Form 446, which may help in evaluating any wasteful spending.
• The estimated number of annual responses and respondents is both 1, suggesting either a very limited scope or potential underestimation of interest or need, which could raise concerns about adequate resource allocation.
• Language could be clearer regarding which individuals specifically qualify as 'non-Government personnel' and under what circumstances they would require this form.
• The document includes repetitive information about obtaining information and submitting comments which could be consolidated for clarity and conciseness.
• The document does not provide a clear explanation of how individuals can determine if they need to fill out this form or how it fits into the broader regulatory framework.