Overview
Title
Notice of Filing
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Entergy Services shared some math homework from 2009 with the Energy Department because the teacher, a big government office, asked them to. People who want to say something about it have until January 11, 2021, to send their comments online.
Summary AI
Entergy Services, LLC submitted a compliance filing with recalculations and supporting documents based on 2009 data, as required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's November 2020 order. Those interested in intervening or protesting must follow specific Commission Rules and submit electronically if possible. The document is accessible online due to the COVID-19 emergency, and questions can be directed to the specified FERC contact points. Submissions for interventions or protests must be completed by January 11, 2021.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The document in question is a formal notice from the Federal Register, dated January 5, 2021. It outlines a compliance filing made by Entergy Services, LLC on behalf of several operating companies. This filing includes recalculations of the "bandwidth formula rate," which involves true-up payments and receipts based on data from the 2009 test year. These recalculations are in response to an order issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in November 2020. The document specifies how interested parties can intervene or protest this filing and encourages electronic submissions due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document presents several complex issues:
Lack of Context: While it details the filing procedure, it lacks information on why the 2009 test year data is being used and how it remains relevant in a 2021 compliance context. This might be confusing for those not deeply engrained in the specifics of regulatory filings.
Impenetrable Language: The references to specific FERC Rules and regulatory language are quite technical. This could present a barrier to those not familiar with legal or regulatory processes.
Omission of Implications: There is no explanation of how these recalculations might affect electricity pricing or availability, leaving stakeholders without a clear understanding of the financial or operational implications.
Complex Filing Instructions: The procedure for submitting interventions or protests is intensive, potentially overwhelming those unfamiliar with the FERC's processes.
Impact on the Public
The broader public may not immediately notice the implications of this document unless these recalculations lead to changes in electricity pricing or reliability. Without clear communication on the potential impacts, consumers might feel disconnected from decisions that could potentially affect their utility bills.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Entergy and Its Customers: For Entergy and its operating companies, this compliance filing is part of adhering to regulatory requirements, which could have ramifications for how they structure their rates or manage finances. Their customers, in turn, might experience changes in their electricity rates depending on the outcome of these recalculations.
Regulatory Bodies: The FERC and associated entities may use the interventions and protests they receive to gauge the public and stakeholder sentiment regarding these recalculations. This could influence future regulatory actions.
Legal and Regulatory Professionals: Individuals working in this sector might see this as an opportunity for engagement, as it presents a need for expertise in navigating complex compliance issues.
In summary, while the document is crucial for compliance and regulatory purposes, it could benefit from a more transparent explanation of the implications and a simplification of its more technical elements. Such changes could make it easier for affected parties, including the general public and specific stakeholders, to fully grasp the potential outcomes of this filing.
Issues
• The document includes instructions for filing a protest or intervention but does not provide any information on the potential implications of the bandwidth formula rate recalculations, which could be helpful for understanding its impact.
• The text does not clarify why the true-up payments and receipts are based on 2009 test year data and how it is relevant to the current compliance filing, which might be unclear or confusing to some readers.
• The document references a specific Commission Order (La. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Entergy Corp., et al.), but does not provide a concise summary of its contents or impacts, which could be beneficial given its importance to the filing.
• Instructions for electronic filing versus paper filing of protests or interventions might be overwhelming due to the multiple steps and entities involved.
• The language used in specifying rules (e.g., Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure) is technical, which may not be easily understood by individuals unfamiliar with regulatory processes.
• There is no mention of any specific budgetary or financial figures involved in the recalculation of the bandwidth formula rate, making it difficult to assess any financial impact or potential waste.