FR 2020-29102

General Summary

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has received a legal complaint from Solas OLED Ltd., a company concerned about certain violations of trade laws. These violations involve the importation and sale of particular types of OLED display devices and their components in the United States. Several well-known technology companies, including BOE Technology and Samsung, have been named as respondents in this complaint. To address these issues, the Commission is inviting comments from the public to consider any related public interest matters—such as effects on consumer choices, the U.S. economy, and public health—before potentially enacting remedies like import restrictions or cease and desist orders.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable issues within the document that may pose challenges for a general audience:

• Complex Legal Terminology: Terms like "permanent limited exclusion order" and "cease and desist orders" are likely beyond the understanding of a layperson. These terms refer to legal measures that can restrict importation or require companies to stop certain activities, respectively, but would benefit from simpler explanations.

• Deadline Ambiguity: The specified deadline for comment submission is indirectly stated as "eight calendar days after the date of publication of this notice." For those unfamiliar with publication processes, this creates ambiguity. A concrete date would facilitate clarity and ensure timely public participation.

• Reliance on Online Access: Multiple URLs are included for accessing further information and submitting comments. While this adds document transparency, it may limit accessibility for individuals without stable internet or digital literacy.

• Undefined Terms: The phrase "commercially reasonable time" regarding replacement of OLED articles lacks definition, which could lead to confusion about expectations and timelines.

• Complex Confidential Submission Instructions: Instructions for submitting confidential information rely heavily on legal citations, making them less accessible to those unfamiliar with legalese.

Broad Public Impact

This document has implications for a wide range of audiences. Members of the public have an opportunity to influence the decision-making process by submitting their thoughts on the potential impact of the ITC's actions. This could affect consumer access to OLED technology and influence market competition, pricing, and product availability in the U.S.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

• Consumers: Since the complaint could lead to import restrictions on certain OLED products, consumers might experience reduced choices or higher prices for certain electronic devices.

• U.S. Economy and Job Market: If specific OLED imports are halted, it could incentivize domestic production, potentially benefiting U.S. workers by creating more manufacturing jobs. Conversely, it could disrupt existing supply chains, impacting industries reliant on these components.

• Technology Companies: Companies named in the complaint face legal and operational uncertainty. Depending on outcomes, they might need to adjust market strategies or find alternative product sources to avoid financial penalties or import bans.

• Public Health and Welfare Considerations: Although less straightforward, there is potential for the ITC's decision to indirectly affect public health if, for instance, it limits access to vital technology used in healthcare or related sectors.

This document underscores the intricacies of international trade regulations and emphasizes the importance of public participation in governmental decision-making processes. By inviting comments, the Commission aims to ensure that any potential actions taken will be well-informed and considerate of the diverse interests involved.