FR 2020-29074

The recent notice from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) introduces a proposal for a new information collection regarding concessions in the National Wildlife Refuge System. This initiative aims to streamline information gathering processes in alignment with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by reducing unnecessary administrative paperwork. The primary focus is to ensure concession activities align with the preservation of wildlife habitats while enhancing the visitor experience. The FWS invites public feedback on the proposal until February 3, 2021.

General Summary

The service's proposal outlines the process by which private businesses and nonprofit organizations can manage recreational amenities within wildlife refuges, offering activities such as lodging, food services, and tours. The concessionaires must uphold standards that minimize interference with wildlife and provide visitors with enhanced recreational experiences. The information gathered ranges from operational methodologies to financial reports, encompassing various detailed documents that prospective concessionaires must submit to obtain and retain operational contracts.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable issue highlighted in the proposal is the introduction of a new information collection process "in use without an OMB Control Number," which typically ensures compliance and tracking of information collection. This lack of a control number might indicate a procedural oversight that could complicate standard monitoring practices.

There's concern that the extensive detail required in information submissions could become burdensome, especially for smaller businesses that might not have ample administrative resources. The frequency and variety of required reports and records may impose significant ongoing administrative tasks, potentially deterring smaller entities from applying due to associated costs estimated at $69,900 annually.

Additionally, the complex legal language referencing multiple acts and requirements may pose an understanding challenge for individuals or organizations without specialized legal expertise.

Public Impact

Broadly, the public stands to benefit from improved management of recreational facilities that offer high-quality and environmentally responsible services, enhancing enjoyment and appreciation of natural refuges. The solicitation for public comments also opens a channel for individuals and organizations to voice their perspectives, fostering transparency and public engagement in federal decisions.

Impact on Stakeholders

For the businesses and nonprofit organizations involved or interested in managing FWS concession opportunities, the impact is double-edged. On the positive side, these entities can play a crucial role in enhancing visitor experiences while contributing to wildlife conservation efforts. The structured proposal process ensures that the selected operators are competent, financially stable, and committed to environmental stewardship.

However, the extensive requirements and associated costs may disproportionately affect smaller businesses, creating barriers to entry and possibly limiting the diversity of participants in concession opportunities.

In conclusion, while the FWS information collection process seeks to align with conservation and administrative efficiency goals, it must balance these objectives with accessibility and feasibility for diverse stakeholders. This document's reception and the feedback it elicits will inform future iterations to better serve both the public and concession operators.

The document from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service discusses information collection related to concessions, highlighting specific financial aspects and their implications. Two financial references stand out: the annual earnings and the estimated costs associated with these operations.

The first financial aspect is the revenue generated by services managed under these concessions. Every year, these services gross approximately $3,000,000, and they provide employment for more than 100 people. This indicates that the concessions operations have a substantial economic impact, not only through significant gross earnings but also by supporting job creation. The revenue generated suggests a positive contribution to the economy, affirming the significance of these concessions in financial terms.

In contrast, the document also references the Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost of $69,900. This figure is crucial because it accounts for expenses such as administrative overhead and the costs associated with developing proposals for concessions opportunities. This amount may represent a considerable financial burden, particularly for smaller businesses or non-profit organizations that might want to participate in these programs. The cost could deter such entities from submitting proposals due to the financial risks involved, which is a notable issue as it might limit diversity and innovation in service delivery within the National Wildlife Refuge System.

This financial cost connects to broader issues? the complexity and potential burden of administrative requirements in the concession process. The extensive nature of the required information from potential concessionaires, coupled with frequent reports and ongoing recordkeeping, contributes to these financial burdens. Smaller entities might find it challenging to bear these costs, which could limit their ability to participate in public-private partnerships with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

In summary, the financial references in the document delineate a balance between significant economic benefits and not-insignificant costs. The concession operations generate large revenues that support jobs and contribute to the economy. Conversely, the substantial estimated costs associated with administrating concessions may pose potential barriers, particularly to smaller organizations, due to the high administrative and financial demands.