Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Energy people are sharing news about some companies wanting to change how they charge for moving gas through big pipes. People can tell the Energy people what they think by sending comments, but they need to do it by a special date.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced several filings related to natural gas pipelines. These filings, which include rate adjustments and negotiated rate amendments, were submitted by various companies, such as Black Hills Wyoming Gas and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, among others. Each filing has specific deadlines for comments, and the public can access details by querying the docket numbers on FERC's eLibrary system. Those wishing to participate in the proceedings must file their interventions or protests by the deadline.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The recent notice in the Federal Register from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) outlines multiple filings concerning adjustments and amendments related to natural gas pipeline rates. These filings have been submitted by several companies, including Black Hills Wyoming Gas, LLC, and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., among others. Each filing is detailed with specific information such as docket numbers, applicant names, filing descriptions, and deadlines for comments and protests, which can be accessed through FERC's eLibrary system by querying the respective docket numbers.
General Summary
The document is essentially a procedural announcement from FERC about several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates. These include rate adjustments, negotiated rate amendments, and motions to intervene. Each filing is accompanied by a deadline for public comments and protests, indicating a structured series of actions that interested parties might need to undertake.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One primary concern is the technical nature of the document. It uses regulatory language and references specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), which may not be easily understood by individuals without a legal or regulatory background. The document also lists multiple docket numbers and corresponding information, requiring careful scrutiny to correctly interpret each entry.
Some issues include potential confusion due to truncated company names, like "Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.," which might lead to misunderstandings or difficulty in identifying the right entity. Additionally, terms like "Motion to Intervene" or "Compliance filing" are not explained, which could be unclear for readers not familiar with legal or regulatory procedures. The encouragement of eFiling without a direct mandate might also create ambiguity regarding the required actions to be compliant.
Public Impact
For the general public, the document doesn't indicate immediate or direct effects, as it primarily outlines procedural steps for entities involved in regulatory compliance. However, the outcomes of these rate adjustments or amendments could indirectly affect natural gas prices, which might trickle down to consumers. Therefore, stakeholders such as businesses reliant on natural gas or community groups concerned about energy rates might find this document pertinent.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the companies involved, the document is critical as it outlines mandatory compliance steps and provides timelines for interventions and protests. Missing these timelines could affect their operations or strategic planning. Stakeholders such as energy service companies and businesses engaged in the natural gas market could face regulatory changes impacting their costs or operations.
Conversely, this process also allows these stakeholders to voice concerns or support for proposed changes through interventions or protests, encouraging participation in the regulatory process. The document thus serves as a vital instrument for transparency, ensuring that decisions over natural gas regulations are made openly with stakeholders having the opportunity for input.
Issues
• The document primarily contains procedural information about filings and required actions, thus does not involve direct spending or funding decisions.
• The language used is technical and specific to regulatory procedures, which might be complex for non-experts.
• The document references specific CFR regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) without providing a summary, which may require additional research for understanding.
• Multiple docket numbers and associated details could be overwhelming and require careful attention to track specific information.
• Some of the names (e.g., 'Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.') may be truncated, leading to potential confusion if full entity names are needed.
• The explanations for actions such as 'Motion to Intervene' and 'Compliance filing' are not elaborated, which might be unclear for individuals unfamiliar with these terms.
• The concept of 'eFiling is encouraged' suggests but does not mandate an action, which may leave room for uncertainty in compliance clarity.