Overview
Title
Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Colorado Interstate Gas Company wants to change one of their wells in Colorado from storing gas to just watching and checking things. People have until February 26, 2021, to say if they're okay with this or not.
Summary AI
Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C. (CIG) has submitted a request to reclassify an injection/withdrawal well to an observation well at their Flank Natural Gas Storage Field in Colorado. They assure that this change will not alter the site's physical parameters or impact service to customers. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) invites public involvement in the review process by allowing protests, motions to intervene, or comments, all of which must be submitted by February 26, 2021. The filing process can be done electronically or by mail, with contact details provided for further assistance.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register announces a request made by the Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C. to reclassify a gas well at their storage field in Colorado. This request involves changing a well from being used for gas injection/withdrawal to being used solely for observation purposes. The company assures that this reclassification will not change the physical parameters of the storage site nor affect services to their customers.
Summary of Document
This notice is part of the regulatory process of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which invites public participation. The notice outlines how interested individuals can engage by filing protests, motions to intervene, or comments. The deadline for submission of these documents is February 26, 2021, and participants have the option to file electronically or by mail.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document does not indicate any direct spending or financial implications related to the reclassification request. However, it largely centers around procedural guidelines which might be challenging for the general public to understand due to the formal and technical language used.
The complexity of the instructions for filing protests, interventions, and comments might be overwhelming for individuals without legal expertise. Additionally, the reliance on references to specific federal regulation sections requires readers to have access to other documents for comprehensive understanding, which may not be straightforward for everyone.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, the document represents an opportunity to engage with the decision-making process of energy regulation but also highlights challenges in accessibility to participate meaningfully. It shows how public involvement is welcomed but requires a level of navigation through legal norms and procedures.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Stakeholders such as local communities in Colorado, environmental advocates, or customers of the gas company may have specific interests in this reclassification. For these stakeholders, the document provides both an opportunity and a procedural hurdle.
Those who might benefit from or be adversely affected by the reclassification have the platform to voice their concerns or support through the mechanisms described. However, the legal language and procedural requirements might present barriers to effective participation, unless stakeholders can leverage knowledgeable representatives or advisors.
In conclusion, while the document serves its purpose of promoting transparency in regulatory actions, it also underscores the complexity of involving the public in regulatory decisions, especially for those without direct access to or understanding of legal resources.
Issues
• The document largely provides procedural information regarding a request by Colorado Interstate Gas Company, with no direct indication of spending or financial implications, raising no clear concerns of wasteful spending or favoritism.
• The language used is mostly formal and regulatory, which can make it difficult to understand for those not familiar with legal or procedural text, but this is common for such notices.
• Instructions regarding filing protests, interventions, and comments are extensive and detailed, which could be overwhelming for laypersons unfamiliar with legal or regulatory processes.
• The document relies on numerous references to specific sections of federal regulations (e.g., 18 CFR 157.205), which could complicate interpretation without access to these documents or understanding of the context.
• The notice assumes a basic understanding of the process related to interventions and protests under these regulations, which might not be accessible to all interested parties.