Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Reserve is updating the rules on how certain companies report money and bank-related information. They're also adding some temporary questions to understand how these companies are handling loans connected to a recent government support program.
Summary AI
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is making changes to financial reporting requirements for holding companies and Edge corporations. These updates include revising the definitions and reporting instructions related to savings deposits and including new temporary data items associated with the CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (PPPLF). The Board also plans to address concerns about consistency across different reports, such as ensuring that savings deposits are consistently classified in the Call Report and other financial statements. Additionally, they have issued clarifications for recording uncollectible accrued interest, shared fees from securities-related activities, and pledged equity securities.
Abstract
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) is adopting a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9 reports; OMB Control Number 7100-0128) and the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income for Edge and Agreement Corporations (FR 2886b; OMB Control Number 7100- 0086). The new revisions to these reports are effective as of March 31, 2021. The Board is also finalizing the following revisions that were previously approved on an interim basis: Revisions to the definition of "savings deposits" in the FR Y-9C and FR 2886b instructions associated with the amendments to the Board's Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions), collection of two new temporary data items on loan modifications consistent with section 4013(d)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, and collection of four new temporary data items related to the an interim final rule implementing the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (PPPLF). These changes became effective June 30, 2020.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The document is a notice from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announcing changes to financial reporting requirements for holding companies and Edge corporations. These changes primarily involve updates to financial statements and definitions, particularly regarding savings deposits and the introduction of new temporary data items in response to the CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (PPPLF). These revisions are part of an ongoing effort to ensure consistency across different financial reports and enhance the clarity of financial data collection.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One of the main challenges posed by this document is its use of complex financial and regulatory language, which might be difficult for the general public to understand without a background in finance or law. The frequent use of acronyms and references to specific schedules and items closely tied to banking regulations assumes a level of familiarity that most readers may not possess.
Moreover, the document involves several discussions on confidentiality, primarily hinging on legal exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This reliance may appear ambiguous to readers unfamiliar with such legislations, as it lacks explicit details on what information will remain confidential versus what could be publicly disclosed.
Another concern is the absence of a clear cost analysis regarding implementing these measures, which leaves readers without insight into possible financial implications, both for the institutions affected and potentially for taxpayers.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the document signifies continuing adjustments in federal financial oversight, particularly in response to economic impacts caused by unforeseen events like the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of regulatory change is indicative of efforts to maintain financial stability and transparency, which indirectly benefits consumers by strengthening the banking system's health.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Holding Companies and Financial Institutions: These stakeholders are directly affected, as they will need to comply with revised reporting requirements and potentially adjust their internal processes to align with updated definitions, such as those affecting savings deposits. This could entail additional administrative costs or a revamping of accounting practices.
Federal Reserve System and Regulatory Bodies: These entities benefit from improved data accuracy and consistency, enabling better oversight and regulatory decision-making. The updated provisions ensure that reporting requirements are in tune with recent legislative changes and economic realities, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of regulatory measures.
Consumers and Investors: Indirectly, these revisions aim to protect consumers and investors by ensuring that financial institutions operate transparently and with adequate oversight. Greater clarity in financial conditions can instill public confidence in the banking system.
In summary, while the document's technical jargon may create hurdles to understanding for the average reader, the systemized changes reflect an overarching aim to maintain regulatory consistency and adapt to new economic contexts, potentially enhancing the financial sector's stability and operation in the long term.
Financial Assessment
The document provides detailed information about reporting requirements and revisions related to financial statements for holding companies. It specifically focuses on the Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9 reports; OMB Control Number 7100-0128) and the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income for Edge and Agreement Corporations (FR 2886b; OMB Control Number 7100-0086).
Financial Reporting and Respondents
The document highlights the reporting obligations for various holding companies, including bank holding companies (BHCs), savings and loan holding companies (SLHCs), securities holding companies, and U.S. intermediate holding companies (IHCs). According to the document, the estimated number of respondents varies based on their total assets:
- FR Y-9C (non-advanced approaches holding companies) with less than $5 billion in total assets: 124 respondents
- FR Y-9C (non-advanced approaches holding companies) with $5 billion or more in total assets: 218 respondents
- FR Y-9C (advanced approaches holding companies): 9 respondents
- Other categories such as FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9ES, and FR Y-9CS also show varying numbers of respondents.
Estimated Burden and Resource Commitment
The document provides detailed estimates of the average hours per response for these financial reports. For example:
- FR Y-9C (non-advanced approaches holding companies) with less than $5 billion in total assets requires an average of 35.72 hours per response.
- In comparison, those with $5 billion or more in total assets require 44.92 hours per response.
Such estimates indicate the resources that organizations must commit to fulfilling these reporting requirements, potentially highlighting the need for personnel who are familiar with financial reporting standards.
Annual Burden Hours
The overall estimated annual burden hours bring to light the significant workload imposed by these reporting obligations:
- The FR Y-9C (non-advanced approaches holding companies) with less than $5 billion in total assets demands approximately 17,715 burden hours annually.
- For those with more than $5 billion in total assets, the estimation rises to 39,166 burden hours annually.
These numbers suggest considerable use of time and resources by the reporting entities, which is a significant aspect of their operational compliance workload.
Targeted Data Collection
The document also indicates specific areas of focus for new data collection efforts. For instance, certain memorandum items are to be collected only from holding companies with $5 billion or more in total consolidated assets. This approach reflects a targeted use of resources by focusing on larger organizations, potentially easing the burden on smaller holding companies. This selective collection method aligns with efforts to balance regulatory oversight while acknowledging different capacities among institutions.
Confidentiality and Reporting Challenges
One notable issue related to financial reporting is the use of exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to maintain confidentiality for certain reported items. This confidentiality assures organizations that sensitive financial information will not be disclosed publicly. However, lack of clear delineation of what is confidential versus public information can lead to misunderstanding among reporting institutions.
In conclusion, the document outlines significant commitments of time and resources required for financial reporting by holding companies. It emphasizes both the regulatory framework's complexity and the specific allocation of reporting responsibilities based on asset size. While these efforts aim to ensure accurate supervision and regulation, they pose challenges in terms of understanding and implementing confidentiality requirements under the FOIA.
Issues
• The document uses complex financial and regulatory language that may be difficult for laypersons to understand. Providing simplified explanations or glossaries for key terms may increase clarity.
• There is significant reliance on acronyms (e.g., FR Y-9C, PPPLF, CARES Act, GAAP) which may not be clear to all readers unless they are explicitly defined earlier in the document. Including definitions for these terms at the start or as a glossary could improve understanding.
• The document refers to various schedules, items, and memo items (e.g., Schedule HI, Schedule HC-P, Memorandum item 16.a) without providing a direct explanation for lesser-known elements, assuming familiarity from the reader.
• There is no clear cost analysis or mention of the potential costs associated with the implementation of these proposals, leaving readers without an understanding of financial implications.
• The information related to confidentiality and exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) might be considered ambiguous, as it heavily relies on referring to specific legislative exemptions without elaborating on what exactly can be disclosed versus what is kept confidential.
• The document mentions temporary and interim measures multiple times, such as temporary reporting requirements and their extension, without discussing potential long-term plans or permanent frameworks.