FR 2020-29021

Overview

Title

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc.; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Changes To Revise Each Exchange's Process for Re-Opening Trading of NYSE-Listed Securities Outside of Regular Trading Hours

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission has decided that four stock exchanges can use computers to start trading certain stocks again after a pause instead of having people do it, which makes the process faster and smoother.

Summary AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved proposed rule changes by four exchanges—Cboe BYX, Cboe BZX, Cboe EDGA, and Cboe EDGX. These changes aim to automate the process for re-opening trading of NYSE-listed securities outside of regular hours when a halt is lifted. Previously, this was done manually by exchange staff, but the new system will automatically restart trading if certain conditions are met, improving efficiency. The SEC found these changes to be consistent with regulations that ensure a fair and open market, with no public comments opposing the proposals.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 158
Document #: 2020-29021
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 158-159

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The document discusses the approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of proposed rule changes by four major exchanges: Cboe BYX, Cboe BZX, Cboe EDGA, and Cboe EDGX. These changes concern how these exchanges handle the re-opening of trading for securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) during hours outside of regular trading. Previously, the process required manual intervention by exchange staff to resume trading after a halt was lifted by NYSE. The approved changes will automate this process, making it more efficient by automatically resuming trading when specific conditions are met.

Significant Issues and Concerns

While the automation of the trading re-opening process appears to offer clear efficiencies, the document is notably technical and uses legal jargon. Terms like "NBBO" (National Best Bid and Offer) and references to specific rule numbers may not be easily understood by the general public. The lack of detailed examples or scenarios illustrating how these conditions are determined could also be seen as a significant oversight, potentially leaving stakeholders unclear on how the new automated process will function in real-world situations.

Additionally, the document does not delve into potential costs or challenges associated with transitioning from a manual to an automated system. Such information would be pertinent for assessing the potential financial impacts or operational hurdles the exchanges may face. Discussions regarding risks or implications for market stability with this shift to automation are also absent, which could be critical for evaluating how these changes might affect market reliability.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, these rule changes could positively impact the public by potentially leading to more efficient and timely re-openings of trading sessions. This enhanced efficiency might result in a more reliable and stable trading environment, which could be reassuring for investors who trade NYSE-listed securities outside of regular market hours. By eliminating manual intervention, the exchanges might also reduce human error, thereby maintaining fair trading practices.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For investors, particularly those who participate in after-hours trading, these changes could lead to quicker execution and less uncertainty around when trading resumes after a halt. However, investors may need to familiarize themselves with the new procedures to understand how and when their orders might be processed.

Exchange staff who previously managed this process manually may experience a shift in responsibilities as their role in re-opening processes diminishes due to automation. On the other hand, the exchanges themselves might benefit from increased operational efficiencies and reduced administrative overhead, allowing resources to be allocated elsewhere.

In conclusion, while the document outlines a straightforward push towards automation in trading processes, further clarity on the nuances of implementation and impact could offer a more comprehensive understanding for stakeholders, both directly involved and observational.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical and legal jargon that may be difficult for a layperson to understand, such as terms like NBBO, extra-hours sessions, and specific rule numbers.

  • • There is no discussion of potential costs or implications associated with implementing the automated re-opening process, which could be relevant for assessing the financial impact.

  • • The document does not provide specific examples or scenarios to help illustrate how the new automated process will define and determine the necessary conditions for re-opening trading.

  • • Language could be more concise in explaining the transition from manual to automated processes for re-opening trading to ensure clarity.

  • • The document does not discuss potential risks or challenges associated with the new automated process, which could be important for evaluating potential impacts on market stability.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,832
Sentences: 60
Entities: 153

Language

Nouns: 514
Verbs: 176
Adjectives: 81
Adverbs: 54
Numbers: 118

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.34
Average Sentence Length:
30.53
Token Entropy:
5.25
Readability (ARI):
22.40

Reading Time

about 7 minutes