FR 2020-27908

Overview

Title

Design Criteria for Dam and Lake Projects

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has decided to remove some old rules about building dams and lakes because they don't affect people outside the agency and have been replaced by newer instructions. This helps everyone avoid confusion and keeps the rules up-to-date.

Summary AI

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, part of the Department of Defense, has issued a final rule to remove the "Design Criteria for Dam and Lake Projects" from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This rule is considered outdated and only pertains to internal agency operations without any public compliance requirements or impact. This change helps avoid confusion and aligns with updated guidance found in the Engineer Manual 1110-2-1602. The rule removal is not significant under regulatory criteria and supports a Department of Defense reform initiative.

Abstract

This final rule removes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' part titled Design Criteria for Dam and Lake Projects. This part is out-of- date and otherwise covers internal agency operations that have no public compliance component or adverse public impact. Therefore, this part can be removed from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

Type: Rule
Citation: 86 FR 1278
Document #: 2020-27908
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 1278-1279

AnalysisAI

The recent rule change by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, part of the Department of Defense, involves the removal of outdated regulations concerning the “Design Criteria for Dam and Lake Projects.” This removal was published in the Federal Register and is effective as of January 8, 2021. The decision to eliminate this specific part of federal regulations was made because it only pertains to internal operations of the Corps and does not impose any compliance requirements or impacts on the public. Consequently, its presence in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) was deemed unnecessary.

By removing these outdated rules, potential confusion is minimized for both the general public and the Corps. The current design and operational guidelines for dam and lake projects are covered in an updated Engineer Manual, which is now publicly accessible online. This updated guidance specifically addresses the hydraulic design aspects of reservoir outlet works, providing necessary information for those involved in the design of the Corps’ Civil Works projects.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable aspect of this document is its technical nature. It references specific manuals and regulatory terms that might not be easily understood by a layperson. This can lead to difficulties for those without a background in engineering or regulatory compliance to fully grasp the implications of the rule change. Although the removal of this regulation does not impact public compliance or impose new costs, it could have benefited from further clarification on how the updated guidelines differ from the removed regulation.

Another potential concern could be the lack of public comment on this rule removal. Because the document claims the rule is strictly related to internal procedures without public impact, it bypassed public consultation. Nonetheless, for transparency and public interest, some might argue that more detailed information or engagement would be beneficial.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the removal of this rule should have minimal direct impact on the general public. Since the regulation did not require public compliance and its removal does not reduce any public burden or costs, the average person will likely see little change as a result of this action. The main goal seems to be administrative efficiency and internal clarity within the Corps.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders within the engineering community, particularly those involved in hydraulic design and civil works projects, the update to internal guidelines could be significant. The transition to referring to the Engineer Manual 1110-2-1602 might require some familiarization with the updated standards and practices outlined therein. However, for those directly involved in related projects, this removal represents a shift toward a streamlined approach to regulatory compliance within the Corps, potentially making project design and implementation more straightforward.

Overall, the move appears to streamline operations without tangible adverse effects on the public or stakeholders, aligning with broader goals of regulatory reform and reducing outdated bureaucratic procedures.

Issues

  • • The document involves removal of a regulation related to internal agency operations, so it does not present issues of wasteful spending or favoritism towards particular organizations or individuals.

  • • The language in the document is technical in nature, particularly in references to regulations and internal manuals, which might be complex for a general audience without background in regulatory or engineering fields.

  • • The document could improve clarity by providing additional context on how the outdated regulation has been replaced by new agency policy, possibly detailing differences or updates in the policy that are relevant to the public or stakeholders.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 616
Sentences: 23
Entities: 59

Language

Nouns: 220
Verbs: 34
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 39

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.69
Average Sentence Length:
26.78
Token Entropy:
5.05
Readability (ARI):
17.42

Reading Time

about 2 minutes