FR 2020-27581

Overview

Title

Rights to Federally Funded Inventions and Licensing of Government Owned Inventions

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to make it easier for inventors who use government money to understand the rules about their inventions, and they're asking people to tell them what they think about the new ideas by April 5, 2021. They will also have a special online talk to explain these changes to everyone.

Summary AI

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has announced a proposal to update regulations concerning inventions funded by federal grants, especially those created by nonprofit organizations and small businesses. These updates aim to simplify existing rules, correct outdated sections, and better define terms and processes. NIST seeks public feedback on these proposed changes by April 5, 2021, and plans to hold a public webinar to discuss these revisions further. These changes are intended to enhance the commercialization and application of federally funded innovations, in line with efforts to boost American innovation.

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) requests comments on proposed revisions to regulations that would further the Return on Investment (ROI) Initiative for Unleashing American Innovation. The proposed revisions to "Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Grants, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements" and "Licensing of Government-Owned Inventions" make technical corrections; reorganize certain subsections; remove outdated and/or unnecessary sections; institute a reporting requirement on Federal agencies; and provide clarifications on definitions, communications, scope of march-in rights, filing of provisional patent applications, electronic filing, the purpose of royalties on government licenses, and the processes for granting exclusive, co-exclusive and partially exclusive licenses and for appeals. NIST intends to hold a webinar regarding the proposed changes and information on that webinar will be available to the public at https://www.nist.gov/tpo/bayh-dole.

Citation: 86 FR 35
Document #: 2020-27581
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 35-44

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Document

The document is a proposed regulation update by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an agency within the United States Department of Commerce. These updates are targeted at rules concerning inventions that have been federally funded, specifically those developed by nonprofit organizations and small businesses. The primary aim is to refine existing rules to make them clearer and more effective. This involves making technical adjustments, eliminating outdated sections, and enhancing definitions and processes. Importantly, NIST is encouraging public feedback on these changes, suggesting a desire for transparency and collaboration. Notably, a public webinar is planned, providing further opportunities for stakeholder engagement.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document presents a number of concerns, primarily due to its complexity and detailed legal language. The intricate nature of the text may pose challenges for small businesses and stakeholders in fully understanding the proposed revisions and their potential impacts. Additionally, the document's reliance on technical terms, particularly in reference to specific parts of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), may demand legal interpretation, which could be a hurdle for those without access to expert legal advice.

Another concern is the broad authority granted to federal agencies to make licensing determinations. While this can streamline processes, it may also lead to worries about oversight and the fairness in decisions, particularly those involving exclusive licenses. Additionally, there is a lack of detail concerning how collected royalties are accounted for in government budgets, which might raise questions about financial transparency.

Impact on the Public

For the broader public, particularly those not directly involved in federal funding or research, the document may seem distant. However, the implications are significant because they involve the commercialization and utilization of federally funded innovations, which can drive technological advances and economic growth. The success of this initiative could potentially bring about new products and services derived from government-funded inventions, benefiting society at large.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For specific stakeholders, such as educational institutions, nonprofit organizations, and small businesses, the impact is more direct. These entities could benefit from the streamlined processes and clarifications, which may reduce administrative burdens and enhance their ability to comply with federal regulations. The increased emphasis on electronic filing may also offer efficiencies, albeit presenting a challenge for those without adequate digital infrastructure.

Yet, some small businesses might find the language concerning “reasonable efforts” to attract licensees subject to interpretation, leading to potential inconsistencies in application. Finally, the lack of guidance regarding licensing of background rights or assignment of government invention rights might leave some stakeholders feeling uncertain about how to navigate these areas.

In conclusion, while the proposed changes bring potential improvements in efficiency and clarity, they also introduce some areas of concern that stakeholders should carefully consider and possibly address through the public commentary process.

Financial Assessment

The Federal Register document discussed here does not involve direct financial allocations or appropriations in terms of spending substantial amounts. It is primarily a proposed rulemaking intended to revise regulations concerning the rights to inventions made under federal funding and the licensing of government-owned inventions. Nonetheless, there are some relevant points regarding financial implications, particularly about regulatory impacts and royalties.

Impact on the Economy

The document explicitly states that this rulemaking is not considered "economically significant" as defined by Executive Order 12866. This means the changes proposed do not have a financial impact of $100 million or more on the economy in any single year. Additionally, they do not have a significant adverse effect on components such as productivity, jobs, or the environment. This suggests any financial implications, if existent, are not substantial enough to warrant economic concern at a national level.

Royalties and Financial Considerations

Another financial component involves the treatment and purpose of royalties. The document clarifies that the royalties collected through licensing government-owned inventions are not meant to replace appropriated funds or serve as an alternative funding mechanism. This clarification addresses a potential concern about how these funds are utilized or accounted for within the federal budget. Ensuring that royalties are not seen as substitutes for government appropriations might be crucial for transparency and accountability in financial management within federal agencies.

Issues and Financial Implications

While the document itself isn't focused on direct financial allocations, the implications of its regulations can have financial impacts for small entities or organizations involved in technology transfer and licensing. Some of the issues identified in the document suggest areas where financial implications might arise indirectly:

  • Technical Complexity and Small Entities: The complexity of the proposed regulations could present challenges for small businesses, which might incur additional costs to understand and comply with the rules, such as needing legal assistance.

  • Electronic Filing Transition: The move towards mandatory electronic filings, while streamlining processes, could entail initial costs for entities without digital infrastructure to meet these new requirements.

  • Royalty and Appropriation Clarification: The document's clarification regarding the use of royalties is aimed at preventing their misuse as alternative funding, which implicitly impacts financial transparency and compliance expectations within agencies.

In summary, while the document does not allocate financial resources directly, the regulatory changes and clarifications could affect financial aspects indirectly, particularly for small businesses and federal agencies managing intellectual property. These changes could lead to costs associated with compliance and adapting to new procedural requirements.

Issues

  • • The document is lengthy and complex, which may make it difficult for stakeholders and small entities to fully understand the proposed changes and their implications.

  • • The language in sections detailing regulations, such as those pertaining to various CFR parts, can be overly technical and complex, which might be challenging for the general public or small businesses to interpret without legal assistance.

  • • The procedures and requirements for engaging in the proposed revisions (such as the filing of comments) may be unclear to individuals or organizations not experienced with navigating federal regulations.

  • • There is a potential concern regarding the authority granted to agencies to make determinations, which might be seen as lacking in oversight or appeal, particularly in decisions related to the granting of exclusive licenses.

  • • The document mentions that royalties collected are not intended as an alternative to appropriated funding, which might suggest a concern about how these funds will be used or accounted for within the budget.

  • • The document does not address licensing of background rights to third parties or government assignment of invention rights, which could lead to ambiguity or missed guidance in critical areas.

  • • The term 'informal agency consultation process' regarding march-in rights might be seen as ambiguous without clear guidelines or procedures.

  • • The explanation of what constitutes 'reasonable under the circumstances' in efforts to attract small business licensees lacks clarity and could be subjective.

  • • The provisions for electronic filing and the transition to digital communications may impose challenges for entities without necessary digital infrastructure or capabilities.

  • • The definition and implementations of 'statutory period' are based on complex legal references which may not be intuitive for non-expert readers or businesses.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 10
Words: 12,554
Sentences: 314
Entities: 778

Language

Nouns: 3,697
Verbs: 1,113
Adjectives: 684
Adverbs: 167
Numbers: 543

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.89
Average Sentence Length:
39.98
Token Entropy:
5.86
Readability (ARI):
25.23

Reading Time

about 52 minutes